On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 12:53:57AM +, Piers Cawley wrote:
: Personally, I've always wished that Perl5 *had* done that. I've toyed
: with the idea of blessing Stashes, but never got around to actually
: implementing anything.
Well, hey, we had to leave something to fix in Perl 6.
What? Oh, ri
Nick Ing-Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mark Sparshatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>I'm not 100% certain about the details but I think this is how it works.
>>
>>In languages like C++ objects and classes are completely seperate.
>>classes form an inheritance heirachy and objects are ins
Mark Sparshatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>I'm not 100% certain about the details but I think this is how it works.
>
>In languages like C++ objects and classes are completely seperate.
>classes form an inheritance heirachy and objects are instances of a
>particular class.
>
>However in some lan
Brent "Dax" Royal-Gordon wrote:
Mark Sparshatt wrote:
The problem is what happens when some Python code tries to call a class
method on a Ruby object? if Python doesn't know about the hidden
reference within Foo it won't be able to find Foo' in order to call the
method.
If I understand correctl
Mark Sparshatt wrote:
The problem is what happens when some Python code tries to call a class
method on a Ruby object? if Python doesn't know about the hidden
reference within Foo it won't be able to find Foo' in order to call the
method.
If I understand correctly, the Ruby object, as represented b
Karl Brodowsky wrote:
Mark Sparshatt wrote:
The problem is what happens when some Python code tries to call a class
method on a Ruby object? if Python doesn't know about the hidden
reference within Foo it won't be able to find Foo' in order to call the
method.
The issue you are addressing is fi
Mark Sparshatt wrote:
The problem is what happens when some Python code tries to call a class
method on a Ruby object? if Python doesn't know about the hidden
reference within Foo it won't be able to find Foo' in order to call the
method.
The issue you are addressing is finding the applicable meth
This is another message that should have gone to the list :-[
Karl Brodowsky wrote:
Mark Sparshatt wrote:
From the description in PDD15 I'm not sure how to hand languages
where a class is also an object. Where Foo is an instance of Foo'
which is an instance of Class.
Could this be handled d
I promise I will learn hwo to use my email program. This should have
gone to the mailing list :-/
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 10:22 PM + 3/12/04, Mark Sparshatt wrote:
Hi,
I've been reading PDD15. It seems that if the object foo is an
instance of the class Foo then foo is a ParrotObject pmc an
Mark Sparshatt wrote:
From the description in PDD15 I'm not sure how to hand languages where
a class is also an object. Where Foo is an instance of Foo' which is an
instance of Class.
Could this be handled during compilation?
The compiler could produce the classes Foo and Foo' and use something
At 10:22 PM + 3/12/04, Mark Sparshatt wrote:
Hi,
I've been reading PDD15. It seems that if the object foo is an
instance of the class Foo then foo is a ParrotObject pmc and Foo is
a ParrotClass pmc.
From the description in PDD15 I'm not sure how to hand languages
where a class is also an o
Hi,
I've been reading PDD15. It seems that if the object foo is an instance
of the class Foo then foo is a ParrotObject pmc and Foo is a ParrotClass
pmc.
From the description in PDD15 I'm not sure how to hand languages where
a class is also an object. Where Foo is an instance of Foo' which is
12 matches
Mail list logo