Leopold Toetsch schrieb:
PAST isn't much more than 'hello.past'. When you search the p6i
archives you'll find some messages about PAST and that it's up to HLL
authors to specify the nodes and what not.
In order to increase confusion, 'languages/punie' uses another PAST,
which is kind of de
Sam Ruby wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
- I've started the AST interface, the "unimplemented" is not quite true.
Just compiling an AST string isn't supported. But compiling an AST
source file (e.g. ast/hello.past) basically works.
What command does one use to compile ast/hello.past?
$ ./parrot
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
- I've started the AST interface, the "unimplemented" is not quite true.
Just compiling an AST string isn't supported. But compiling an AST
source file (e.g. ast/hello.past) basically works.
What command does one use to compile ast/hello.past?
- Needs a lot more tests. Is
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please forgive the newbie question, but I am trying to see if I can
> assess the current state of Python on Parrot to see if I can help in any
> way.
> I've jotted down some of what I have found so far here:
>http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2004/10/02/Py
Please forgive the newbie question, but I am trying to see if I can
assess the current state of Python on Parrot to see if I can help in any
way.
I've jotted down some of what I have found so far here:
http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2004/10/02/Pyrate
- Sam Ruby
