David L . Nicol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Dan Sugalski wrote: >> >> On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: >> > >> > this list is _only_ concerned with implementation details. >> >> Well, assuming you consider API definitions implementation details. :) >> >> Dan > > >I thought from the example RFC that perl6-internals was the only list >there was, or that the librarian would assign to a list (as happens >at IETF) if I suggested wrong list. Posting here was okay - my message was supposed to be in the "spirt" of the "virtual librarian" and suggest that as your RFC only deals with Perl visible syntax it would be better posted to the language list. Similar things are already being discussed there... -- Nick Ing-Simmons
