Re: failure notice

2008-04-10 Thread John M. Dlugosz
It will always be too early, and too late. There will always be reasons not to do it till next year, and reasons you're hosed because it wasn't done years ago. Now is all we've got at the moment... Larry That's how C++ was. The call to ANSI was hot on the heels of a statement saying i

My specdoc (was Failure Notice)

2008-04-10 Thread John M. Dlugosz
Larry Wall larry-at-wall.org |Perl 6| wrote: Just so you don't think this is warnocked, I'm looking at it, and thinking about it. Thanks. I thought perhaps everyone filtered it out since it had a bad subject line. By and large it seems to be going the right direction, though I've naturall

Re: failure notice

2008-04-10 Thread Larry Wall
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:11:05PM -0700, jerry gay wrote: : On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : > On a larger question, I'm wondering if it's time to slush/freeze : > the Synopses as historical documents and put all spec effort into : > the new form (presum

Re: failure notice

2008-04-10 Thread jerry gay
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On a larger question, I'm wondering if it's time to slush/freeze > the Synopses as historical documents and put all spec effort into > the new form (presumably as a wiki that knows how to serialize into > a document). I

Re: failure notice

2008-04-10 Thread Larry Wall
Just so you don't think this is warnocked, I'm looking at it, and thinking about it. By and large it seems to be going the right direction, though I've naturally got a number of quibbles. Probably each quibble needs to be a separate thread though, since many of them will probably breed discussion.

failure notice

2008-04-09 Thread John M. Dlugosz
I've been working hard on re-organizing the S\d\d docs and other lore into a technical specification with an outline suitable for the contents. But lately I've done some "original work" on what strong typing means and the detailed semantics of having types. So, please take a look at section 10

Re: failure notice

2005-08-06 Thread Robert
PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Moin, > > robert, you need to work on your reply-to address :) > > - -- Forwarded Message -- > > Subject: failure notice > Date: Saturday 06 August 2005 11:38 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > &

Fwd: failure notice

2005-08-06 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, robert, you need to work on your reply-to address :) - -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: failure notice Date: Saturday 06 August 2005 11:38 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi. This is the qmail-send program at relay03