Re: library assumptions

2002-04-08 Thread Russ Allbery
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would expect that should be fine, stdarg is one of the 4 headers that > are guaranteed by ANSI C89 even on a free standing environment (read > embedded targets, etc.) > Its integral to C, and if you don't have it, I suppose the question > would be why

Re: library assumptions

2002-04-08 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 6:32 PM -0400 4/7/02, Roman Hunt wrote: >Hello all: > I was just begining work on the string api and was wondering what > libraries are allowed for use inside the interpreter. Mainly > I want to know if I can use As Melvin's said, that's fine. Pretty much everything else needs a Confi

Re: library assumptions

2002-04-08 Thread Melvin Smith
At 06:32 PM 4/7/2002 -0400, Roman Hunt wrote: >Hello all: > I was just begining work on the string api and was wondering what > libraries are allowed for use inside the interpreter. Mainly > I want to know if I can use I would expect that should be fine, stdarg is one of the 4 headers tha

library assumptions

2002-04-08 Thread Roman Hunt
Hello all: I was just begining work on the string api and was wondering what libraries are allowed for use inside the interpreter. Mainly I want to know if I can use --Roman