Dave Whipp wrote:
> Matt Fowles
>> Were this C++ I would say that we could write a single general
>> purpose stack and use template meta-programming to avoid the
>> overhead. Is there a similar solution available in C?
>>
>> My instincts tell me that this solution will be dirty to the tune of
>> m
Dave Whipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> C does do templates, sort-of:
> #define STACK_TYPE int
> #define STACK_MAX_SIZE 1024
> #include stack_template_decl.h
> #include stack_template_impl.h
> #undef STACK_TYPE
> #undef STACK_MAX_SIZE
> There can be some issues debugging this stuff though:
And
"Matt Fowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Were this C++ I would say that we could write a single general purpose
> stack and use template meta-programming to avoid the overhead. Is there
> a similar solution available in C?
>
> My instincts tell me that this solution will be dirty to the tune of
> massi
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
( /me again mumbling why we have 6 different stack implementations with
a lot of duplicate code. One general stack with different sized data
items would do it too - with some overhead ;-)
Were this C++ I would say that we could write a single general purpose
stack and use te
