At 2:51 PM +0100 8/10/02, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 04:10:50PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>> This has an implication for bytecode generation--it means that at
>> least one pointer-sized word at the end of the bytecode will get
>> altered at load time. This is OK--we can use
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 04:10:50PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> This has an implication for bytecode generation--it means that at
> least one pointer-sized word at the end of the bytecode will get
> altered at load time. This is OK--we can use it as the bytecode fixup
> section. (I expect we'll
