Here's my experience: when I'm learning a new language or software, eg.,
php or css or recently GRAV CMS, and I have a problem, my first action
is google: . I'm sure everyone does something like this.
Whenever I see a response that includes Stackoverflow, I look there
first because for over
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> I replied to this one in private, but I want to make a point in public as
> well.
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 4:24 PM Brad Gilbert wrote:
>>
>> The barrier is not with Stack Overflow. (←What I obviously meant)
>> The barrier is within you.
I replied to this one in private, but I want to make a point in public as
well.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 4:24 PM Brad Gilbert wrote:
> The barrier is not with Stack Overflow. (←What I obviously meant)
> The barrier is within you.
>
There's an insidious assumption hidden in here: that "the barrie
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:42 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:38 PM Brad Gilbert wrote:
>>
>> > The barrier is non-existent.
>>
>> I have only ever heard about speculated and imagined barriers.
>
>
> This is not proof that such barriers don't exist. I hit the magic 2 mar
As I said, all and any reason to not post in StackOverflow are valid. Just
add a few points here
El mar., 12 jun. 2018 a las 21:19, Brad Gilbert ()
escribió:
> Stack Overflow is from Fog Creek Software.
> See https://stackoverflow.com/company
>
> They also regularly provide bulk downloads of all
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:38 PM Brad Gilbert wrote:
> > The barrier is non-existent.
>
> I have only ever heard about speculated and imagined barriers.
>
This is not proof that such barriers don't exist. I hit the magic 2
mark and lasted less than a week afterward because the rules suddenly
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:29 PM, The Sidhekin wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:18 PM, Brad Gilbert wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Joseph Brenner wrote:
>> > Attention conservation: it's unlikely I'm going to say something
>> > interesting you haven't thought of already.
>>
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:18 PM, Brad Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Joseph Brenner wrote:
> > Attention conservation: it's unlikely I'm going to say something
> > interesting you haven't thought of already.
> >
> > A side-discussion that came up here: should you ask question
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Joseph Brenner wrote:
> Attention conservation: it's unlikely I'm going to say something
> interesting you haven't thought of already.
>
> A side-discussion that came up here: should you ask questions here, or
> at stackoverflow (or both here *and* at stackoverflo
Hi
El mar., 12 jun. 2018 a las 20:33, Joseph Brenner ()
escribió:
> Right, that's still another issue: it really does invariably come off
> as rude if you camp out at one discussion site and try to redirect
> the traffic to your own favorite one.
>
I think that by now it's quite clear that wasn'
Right, that's still another issue: it really does invariably come off
as rude if you camp out at one discussion site and try to redirect
the traffic to your own favorite one.
But then, JJ Merelo (and Elizabeth Mattijsen) really aren't even
very bad offenders, as these things go. The fall-back pos
I'm going to stay out of this one, except to the point that my problem with
stackoverflow is none of these. It's more fundamental than that. And it's
not something that can be "fixed" on my side. (Suffice it that there might
be a Nobel Prize in medicine for someone who figures out how to do that.)
Attention conservation: it's unlikely I'm going to say something
interesting you haven't thought of already.
A side-discussion that came up here: should you ask questions here, or
at stackoverflow (or both here *and* at stackoverflow).
I understand the argument that it's better to talk about per
13 matches
Mail list logo
