t work, but
its not in a state that I'd recommend general usage.
2) Parrot isn't an acronym, and as such should be capitalized Parrot.
(Unless you're on a teletype or using RAD-50) If you want to use
PARROT the proper usage is:
PARROT*
* which stands for nothing
3) I ca
I've created the following WIKI
(http://www.vendian.org/parrot/wiki/bin/view.cgi/Main/WhyUseParrot) in
response to Havoc Pennington's recent Opinion Article on Footnotes which
advocates JAVA/JVM as the future of the Open Source Desktop.
Please, feel free to check this out and respo
At 03:41 PM 10/21/2001 -0400, Rocco Caputo wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 12:20:29PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >
> > I suppose. I hadn't planned on inlining parrot assembly into any other
> > language. (The first person who suggests an asm() function *will* get
> > smacked... :) You'll certai
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 12:20:29PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> I suppose. I hadn't planned on inlining parrot assembly into any other
> language. (The first person who suggests an asm() function *will* get
> smacked... :) You'll certainly be able to use modules written purely in
> parrot a
At 08:11 PM 10/20/2001 +0200, raptor wrote:
>hi,
>
>will it be possible to do this inside Perl program :
>
>
>use parrot;
>...parrot code...
>no parrot;
>OR
>
>sub mysub is parrot {
> parrot code ...
>}
I suppose. I hadn't planned on inlining pa
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 08:11:27PM +0200, raptor wrote:
> will it be possible to do this inside Perl program :
>
> use parrot;
> ...parrot code...
> no parrot;
Bad idea of the day --> Inline::Parrot!
--
Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.pobox.com
hi,
will it be possible to do this inside Perl program :
use parrot;
...parrot code...
no parrot;
OR
sub mysub is parrot {
parrot code ...
}
=
iVAN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
