Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 10:49:14AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
I failed to follow most of the specific details, and all of the x86 specific
stuff.
Basically, all non JITed opcodes, which are now called functions
(Parrot_jit_normal_op) would instead get jumped to in
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 10:49:14AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> >Nicholas Clark wrote:
>
> >>Inside a cgoto core have 1 extra op - enter JITted section.
>
> >Or go the other way round: Run from JIT. If there is a sequence of non
> >JITable ops, convert these to a C
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> The 2004 Performance challenge
>> Dan announced that he'd made a bet with Guido van Rossum that Parrot
>> would be faster at executing a pure python benchmark
>
>
> [ ... ]
>
>
>> For some reason nobody comme
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 2004 Performance challenge
Dan announced that he'd made a bet with Guido van Rossum that Parrot
would be faster at executing a pure python benchmark
[ ... ]
For some reason nobody commented on this.
The CGP runloop was the comment ;-)
Thanks f
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20030209
Welcome to the latest Perl 6 summary, your handy cut out and keep guide
to the goings on in the crazy world of Perl 6 design and development.
It's been a rather quiet week this week; only 75 messages in
perl6-internals and a mere 57
Jürgen Bömmels (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Jürgen Bömmels
# Please include the string: [perl #20839]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=20839 >
Hello,
imcc segfaults if you run
languages/imcc/imcc
# New Ticket Created by Jürgen Bömmels
# Please include the string: [perl #20839]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=20839 >
Hello,
imcc segfaults if you run
languages/imcc/imcc -a t/op/basic_12.pasm
The reason
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Nicholas Clark wrote:
Inside a cgoto core have 1 extra op - enter JITted section.
Or go the other way round: Run from JIT. If there is a sequence of non
JITable ops, convert these to a CGP section, which returns to JIT when
finished. This would save a lot of functio
On måndag, feb 10, 2003, at 23:03 Europe/Stockholm,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
50% of the time your function/label/loop/jump is 16 byte aligned.
50% of the time your function/label/loop/jump is "randomly" aligned
So, a slight code size change early on in a file can cause the
remaining
functions
Simon Glover wrote:
Hi all.
The new CGP code causes compilation of interpreter.c to fail if
HAVE_COMPUTED_GOTO is undefined.
Ah, yes thanks. I have checked in a fix.
leo
10 matches
Mail list logo
