> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 15:55
> To: Dave Page
> Subject: Changes committed
>
>
> Dear Dave,
>
> Changes are commited to CVS : bugfix, view OID retrieval,
> view rollback.
>
Definitely looks like it's headin
> A fine upgrade to an already good product. It still has exactly the right
features for DB admin, and no extraneous fluff.
Thanks. Dave, Chris likes your pgAdmin2 very much.
> Is there an option that would simulate the old Security Window from PgAdmin
(1) ? I found the security wizard, but it
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 13:23
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] To-Do List
>
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Altering view definition is still broken. Can you help me
> understand why?
Hi Dave,
Altering view definition is still broken. Can you help me understand why?
This is not a question of .dll as I recompiled everything a restarted the
computer.
> 1) Rollback in case of failure is not yet enabled (or tested?)
The code is commented. I will uncomment after 2) is fixes.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 11:44
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Dave Page
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Trigger display bug
>
>
> Dear Dave,
>
> CREATE TRIGGER "tg_term_source_iu" BEFORE DELETEINSERT OR UPDATE ON
Dear Dave,
CREATE TRIGGER "tg_term_source_iu" BEFORE DELETEINSERT OR UPDATE ON
"translationforge_term_source" FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE
tg_term_source_iu();
The properties of the trigger appear to be OK. Only the SQL definition does
not display well. I tried to understand the bug but di
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 10:57
> To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] plpgsql_call_handler
>
>
> Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 11:51, Dave Page a écrit :
> > No, it's user defined beca
Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 11:51, Dave Page a écrit :
> No, it's user defined because the user/sysadmin adds it himself.
plpgsql_call_handler is a sys object added by user input.
It does not necassary mean it is a user object.. Users may think it is
allowed to drop this object ***because*** it
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 10:36
> To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] plpgsql_call_handler
>
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> I see plpgsql_call_handler is part of user objects in function list.
> Sho
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 10:20
> To: Dave Page
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] To-Do List
>
>
> Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 11:13, Dave Page a écrit :
> > Fixed that (you forgot to reset the tag on txtPropertie
Hi Dave,
I see plpgsql_call_handler is part of user objects in function list.
Shouldn't it be part of system objects?
Cheers,
Jean-Michel
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 09:37
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ALTER VIEW
>
>
> Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 10:27, Dave Page a écrit :
> > I just noticed in your update you forgot to alter
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 10:05
> To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] To-Do List
>
>
> Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 10:23, Dave Page a écrit :
> > If there's anything I've missed, ple
Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 10:23, Dave Page a écrit :
> If there's anything I've missed, please let me
> know.
IMHO, PostgreSQL installer under Cygwin is ***essential***. This is the next
thing after table alter column. By the way, when do you think you will be
ablt to fix view definition, jus
Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 10:27, Dave Page a écrit :
> I just noticed in your update you forgot to alter the pgView.SQL function
> entry iLogEvent call to log the new parameters; It should look like:
>
> Public Property Get SQL(Optional PseudoAlter As Boolean) As String
> On Error GoTo Err_Handl
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 09:21
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Pseudo modification of views
> and triggers ( again)
>
>
> Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 09:17, Dave Page a
Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 09:17, Dave Page a écrit :
> BTW, have you been following the discussion on pgsql-hackers about the
> ongoing pl/pgSQL drop column code?
Yes, sounds interesting but the code will probably be very close to ours.
But, didn't we say no PL/pgSQL in our previous discussion
I've just updated and re-organised the pgAdmin To-Do list. It's checked into
CVS & updated on the website. If there's anything I've missed, please let me
know.
Regards, Dave.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 19 February 2002 21:19
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Pseudo modification of views
> and triggers (again)
>
>
> > I've just found out that views can be renamed
19 matches
Mail list logo
