> To be honest, Python is the only one of those I've heard of. Do you know
> any good sites I could look at or should I just use Google?
Dear all,
1) WxWindows
http://www.wxWindows.org
http://www.wxWindows.org/screensh.htm
2) WxPython
http://www.wxpython.org
http://www.wxpython.org/wxpshots.php
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 March 2002 21:59
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] The future of pgAdmin II...
>
>
> Dave,
>
> If there's one motto I've learned over the years.. "If it
> ain't broke, don't fix it."
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Boyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 March 2002 19:24
> To: Justin Clift; Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] The future of pgAdmin II...
>
>
> Dave/All,
>
> apologies if this has been discussed before but have you
Dave,
If there's one motto I've learned over the years.. "If it ain't broke,
don't fix it." Why move to VB.NET (C#, VB.NET, etc.) in the first place?
What new features and performances increases are going to be made
available over the VB6 implementation of it ? I spent hundreds of dollars
on Vi
Dave/All,
apologies if this has been discussed before but have you considered
boa/python/wxwindows as a target platform?
I haven't looked at boa for a while but it was usable a while back and
offered a very delphi like ide. I think that potentially both projects
could benefit as a number of
For those that are interested in looking at new things, apparently the
(free) MS .NET SDK includes command line compilers for VB/C#.
Combine that with: http://www.icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SD and from what I
can tell you have a free development system, just no visual form editor.
Regards, Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Clift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 March 2002 14:41
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] The future of pgAdmin II...
>
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> >
>
> > For the longterm future (i.e. pgAdmin III), I think
Dave Page wrote:
>
> For the longterm future (i.e. pgAdmin III), I think the way forward is C#.
> I've been playing with this over the last few days and it seems fairly easy
> to learn, and should easily do what would be required. The best bit is that
> there should be an open-source compiler an
> -Original Message-
> From: Henshall, Stuart - WCP
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 March 2002 10:55
> To: 'Dave Page'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [pgadmin-hackers] The future of pgAdmin II...
>
>
> Hello,
> I don't know what elements would be needed for .NET but
Hello,
I don't know what elements would be needed for .NET but it would
certainly be a pain if older windows needed to spend ages downloading to get
it working (or worse, couldn't get a .NET version working). Also I'm not
sure but I thought the mono project had very few class libraries com
Probably a little less dramatic than the subject implies, but I've now had a
chance to play with Visual Studio.NET and got to thinking about where we're
going with pgAdmin II.
I've performed a test upgrade of the pgAdmin II main project to VB.NET -
believe it or not, the upgrade report (attached
11 matches
Mail list logo
