Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RFD: PostgreSQL Schema Support

2002-04-05 Thread pgsql
At 13:40 05/04/2002 +0100, Dave Page wrote: >I'm currently starting to implement support for some of the more desirable >features of PostgreSQL 7.3 which is now well in development. One of these I wish the desirable features for 7.3 included all of alter table implemented. Do you know if it is B

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Latest DataTable Code

2002-04-03 Thread pgsql
At 08:45 03/04/2002 +0100, Dave Page wrote: >Hi Tim, > >Apologies for not getting to this sooner... > >I just took a *quick* look at the latest DataTable code. Looks good, just 2 >things spring to mind: > >1) Resize doesn't appear to work either in design mode, or runtime. Next job on the to do l

[pgadmin-hackers] Help Documentation, coding Standards, typo

2002-03-22 Thread pgsql
In coding standards help page, Dave, you have g down as your notation for Double but the example has dTotal as the example. I guess you mean 'd', so the is a typo. Coding Standards does not say what label controls should start with. Tim. ---(end of broadcast)--

[pgadmin-hackers] DataTable new upload

2002-03-22 Thread pgsql
Dave, Jean-Michel, Mark, I have submitted a new set of files to the CVS in dev/datatable see the readme.txt in /dev/datatable for details - note I have NOT yet had time to implement all the suggestions Dav gave last time I uploaded a version. when commiting files to the cvs it asks for the log

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] First DataTable submission to CVS!!

2002-03-20 Thread pgsql
>concerns will be (in the future, when your looking to integrate the code), >object/variable naming, consistant indenting (2 char), and licence the >comments. > Yes, thats fine. >1) Check the spelling of dtbFieldConstraint's values before you write too >much code around them. Thanks! >2) I do