Le 27/07/2010 11:00, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
>> http://www.pgadmin.org/translation/status.php doesn't seem too good :-/
>> There's maybe an issue with the cron scripts.
>
> The code was checking to see if it was in an SVN repo. I changed i
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
> http://www.pgadmin.org/translation/status.php doesn't seem too good :-/
> There's maybe an issue with the cron scripts.
The code was checking to see if it was in an SVN repo. I changed it to
look for .git/config instead of .svn/format
-
Le 19/07/2010 21:12, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
>> Did you give me the rights to commit there? it seems I can't push anything.
>
> Oops, sorry - I only gave you read permission. Fixed now - don't know
> how long it'll take to take effect thou
Le 19/07/2010 21:12, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
>> Did you give me the rights to commit there? it seems I can't push anything.
>
> Oops, sorry - I only gave you read permission. Fixed now - don't know
> how long it'll take to take effect thou
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
> Did you give me the rights to commit there? it seems I can't push anything.
Oops, sorry - I only gave you read permission. Fixed now - don't know
how long it'll take to take effect though.
> The script that pull the .po files from the r
Le 19/07/2010 20:29, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
>> Le 19/07/2010 12:05, Dave Page a écrit :
>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>>> wrote:
Le 18/07/2010 22:55, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> Le 18/07/2010 21:55, Dav
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
> Le 19/07/2010 12:05, Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> wrote:
>>> Le 18/07/2010 22:55, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
Le 18/07/2010 21:55, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 8:5
Le 19/07/2010 12:05, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
>> Le 18/07/2010 22:55, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>>> Le 18/07/2010 21:55, Dave Page a écrit :
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
>>> [...]
I do still nee
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
> Le 18/07/2010 22:55, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>> Le 18/07/2010 21:55, Dave Page a écrit :
>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>>> wrote:
>> [...]
>>> I do still need to update the website to pull things like the TOD
Le 18/07/2010 22:55, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> Le 18/07/2010 21:55, Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> wrote:
> [...]
>> I do still need to update the website to pull things like the TODO and
>> bugs lists from GIT. I'll do that tomorrow AM probably.
>
Le 18/07/2010 21:55, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
>> So, is the GIT repo read/write now? or should I wait a bit? :)
>
> I think so. I just had a minor scare, but that turned out to be me
> screwing up a merge, rather than a GIT issue.
>
OK, d
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
> So, is the GIT repo read/write now? or should I wait a bit? :)
I think so. I just had a minor scare, but that turned out to be me
screwing up a merge, rather than a GIT issue.
I do still need to update the website to pull things like th
Le 18/07/2010 20:51, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> wrote:
>>> Le 17/07/2010 02:15, Dave Page a écrit :
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> The pgAdmin III repo is goin
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
>> Le 17/07/2010 02:15, Dave Page a écrit :
>>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>>>
The pgAdmin III repo is going to take a fair bit of effort I suspect...
>>>
>
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
> Le 17/07/2010 02:15, Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>> The pgAdmin III repo is going to take a fair bit of effort I suspect...
>>
>> Phew, that was an understatement. I think the tags are all
Le 17/07/2010 02:15, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>> The pgAdmin III repo is going to take a fair bit of effort I suspect...
>
> Phew, that was an understatement. I think the tags are all OK now - I
> just had to re-apply the last four patches to trun
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> The pgAdmin III repo is going to take a fair bit of effort I suspect...
Phew, that was an understatement. I think the tags are all OK now - I
just had to re-apply the last four patches to trunk for some reason
that I haven't fully understood ye
It seems like the easiest way to fix the tags in the migrated GIT
repositories is to re-tag them manually, based on the SVN history.
That is now done for pgadmin1, pgadmin2 and pgagent, all of which are
now live on git.postgresql.org. The www module didn't have any tags,
and is also there as pgadmi
18 matches
Mail list logo
