> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 28 March 2002 07:19
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Justin Clift; Dave Page
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] The future of pgAdmin II...
>
>
> &
> To be honest, Python is the only one of those I've heard of. Do you know
> any good sites I could look at or should I just use Google?
Dear all,
1) WxWindows
http://www.wxWindows.org
http://www.wxWindows.org/screensh.htm
2) WxPython
http://www.wxpython.org
http://www.wxpython.org/wxpshots.php
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 March 2002 21:59
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] The future of pgAdmin II...
>
>
> Dave,
>
> If there's one motto I've learned over the yea
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Boyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 March 2002 19:24
> To: Justin Clift; Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] The future of pgAdmin II...
>
>
> Dave/All,
>
> apologies if this has been
Dave,
If there's one motto I've learned over the years.. "If it ain't broke,
don't fix it." Why move to VB.NET (C#, VB.NET, etc.) in the first place?
What new features and performances increases are going to be made
available over the VB6 implementation of it ? I spent hundreds of dollars
on Vi
Dave/All,
apologies if this has been discussed before but have you considered
boa/python/wxwindows as a target platform?
I haven't looked at boa for a while but it was usable a while back and
offered a very delphi like ide. I think that potentially both projects
could benefit as a number of
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Clift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 March 2002 14:41
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] The future of pgAdmin II...
>
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> >
>
> > For the l
Dave Page wrote:
>
> For the longterm future (i.e. pgAdmin III), I think the way forward is C#.
> I've been playing with this over the last few days and it seems fairly easy
> to learn, and should easily do what would be required. The best bit is that
> there should be an open-source compiler an
> -Original Message-
> From: Henshall, Stuart - WCP
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 March 2002 10:55
> To: 'Dave Page'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [pgadmin-hackers] The future of pgAdmin II...
>
>
> Hello,
> I don't kn
: Dave Page [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 March 2002 10:56
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] The future of pgAdmin II...
>
>
>
> Probably a little less dramatic than the subject implies, but
> I've now had a
> chance to play with
Probably a little less dramatic than the subject implies, but I've now had a
chance to play with Visual Studio.NET and got to thinking about where we're
going with pgAdmin II.
I've performed a test upgrade of the pgAdmin II main project to VB.NET -
believe it or not, the upgrade report (attached
11 matches
Mail list logo
