Re: Timestamp reverse engeneering bug

2002-02-21 Thread Jean-Michel POURE
L I'm using my phone right now so I can't check, but I'm pretty sure that's > not a bug. Isn't timestamptz a timestamp with timezone e.g. 2002-02-21 > 19:00:00+00? You are right.

Re: Timestamp reverse engeneering bug

2002-02-21 Thread Dave Page
's broken for one type it probably would be for all types. I'll check when I can... Regards, Dave _Original message Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Timestamp reverse engeneering bug Sender: Jean-Michel POURE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 21

Timestamp reverse engeneering bug

2002-02-21 Thread Jean-Michel POURE
Hi Dave, Table definition with timestamps under 7.2 return "timestamptz". Cheers, Jean-Michel POURE