Re: plpgsql_call_handler

2002-02-20 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 20 February 2002 10:57 > To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] plpgsql_call_handler > > > Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 11:51, Dave Page a écrit : &

Re: plpgsql_call_handler

2002-02-20 Thread Jean-Michel POURE
Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 11:51, Dave Page a écrit : > No, it's user defined because the user/sysadmin adds it himself. plpgsql_call_handler is a sys object added by user input. It does not necassary mean it is a user object.. Users may think it is allowed to drop this object **

Re: plpgsql_call_handler

2002-02-20 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 20 February 2002 10:36 > To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] plpgsql_call_handler > > > Hi Dave, > > I see plpgsql_call_handler is part of

plpgsql_call_handler

2002-02-20 Thread Jean-Michel POURE
Hi Dave, I see plpgsql_call_handler is part of user objects in function list. Shouldn't it be part of system objects? Cheers, Jean-Michel