Re: [pgadmin-support] Coordinate transformation

2010-01-20 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Hi, Le 20/01/2010 19:38, legio nostra a écrit : > [...] > I have a database created with the program pgadmin3. The geo-referencing > system is the Datum 73 / Modified Portuguese > > Grid (deprecated) "EPSG: 27492" and wanted to change the whole database to > the coordinate system ETRS89 / Portuga

[pgadmin-support] Coordinate transformation

2010-01-20 Thread legio nostra
Hello everyone, I have a database created with the program pgadmin3. The geo-referencing system is the Datum 73 / Modified Portuguese Grid (deprecated) "EPSG: 27492" and wanted to change the whole database to the coordinate system ETRS89 / Portugal TM06 (EPSG: 3763). How can I make this transfor

Re: [pgadmin-support] Re: PgAdmin browses all tables, even those not allowed

2010-01-20 Thread Michael Shapiro
I don't think the assumption that CREATE implies SELECT is a good one. It is probably true in most cases, but there might be folks that have set it up otherwise. It seems that the Dependents tab on a role under the Login Roles might be the place to look for tables, etc, that the login has access t

Re: [pgadmin-support] Re: PgAdmin browses all tables, even those not allowed

2010-01-20 Thread Joe Garrett
When I say end-user I am thinking from a Data Warehouse perspective where there are many SELECT-only users. For them, their experience is frustrating and confusing when they need to go through many schemas and tables that they don't care about to find what they can access. That is why I sugge

[pgadmin-support] Re: PgAdmin browses all tables, even those not allowed

2010-01-20 Thread F T
Thank for your answer. There are advantages / disavantages for end-users with the 2 solutions Solution 1: Let the end-user see only the schemas/tables he is allowed to use (as Oracle SQL Developper does, for example) : + : easy to retrieve their data without been lost if the database has

Re: [pgadmin-support] PgAdmin browses all tables, even those not allowed

2010-01-20 Thread Dave Page
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Joe Garrett wrote: > I hearby place my vote for allowing us to hide schemas and tables that a > user has no priviliges on (and columns too would be useful but of secondary > importance).  I believe this is a PostgreSQL request and not a pgAdmin3 > request.  I regul