Robert Haas writes:
> At the risk of being labeled a stickler for the details, this thread
> is both on the wrong mailing list and discussing a topic quite
> different from what the subject line would suggest.
Fair complaint. Redirected to -hackers at
https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 4:50 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> Indeed.
At the risk of being labeled a stickler for the details, this thread
is both on the wrong mailing list and discussing a topic quite
different from what the subject line would suggest.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterpri
Hi,
On 2019-05-21 16:47:55 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > -check: test.sh all
> > - MAKE=$(MAKE) bindir="$(tbindir)" libdir="$(tlibdir)"
> > EXTRA_REGRESS_OPTS="$(EXTRA_REGRESS_OPTS)" $(SHELL) $< $(DOINST)
> > +check: test.sh all temp-install
> > + MAKE=$(MAKE) $(with_tem
Andres Freund writes:
> -check: test.sh all
> - MAKE=$(MAKE) bindir="$(tbindir)" libdir="$(tlibdir)"
> EXTRA_REGRESS_OPTS="$(EXTRA_REGRESS_OPTS)" $(SHELL) $< $(DOINST)
> +check: test.sh all temp-install
> + MAKE=$(MAKE) $(with_temp_install)
> bindir=$(abs_top_builddir)/tmp_install/$(bind
Hi,
On 2019-05-20 17:47:17 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2019-05-20 20:19:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andres Freund writes:
> > > On 2019-05-20 14:09:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > 3) The fact that src/bin/pg_upgrade/Makefile invokes test.sh with
> > >MAKE=$(MAKE) triggers make, for rea
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2019-05-21 10:20:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The least invasive way to do that seems to be as attached, building a
>> little knowledge into pg_regress's psql_command() function. Alternatively
>> we could add a "bool quiet" parameter to that function so that callers
>>
Hi,
On 2019-05-21 10:20:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2019-05-20 20:19:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> The other thing I had to do below was to suppress "NOTICE: database
> >> "regression" does not exist, skipping". The added createdb is a
> >> mighty expensive and grot
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2019-05-20 20:19:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The other thing I had to do below was to suppress "NOTICE: database
>> "regression" does not exist, skipping". The added createdb is a
>> mighty expensive and grotty way to do that, but I didn't immediately
>> see a better o
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2019-05-20 20:19:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The other thing I had to do below was to suppress "NOTICE: database
>> "regression" does not exist, skipping". The added createdb is a
>> mighty expensive and grotty way to do that, but I didn't immediately
>> see a better o
Hi,
On 2019-05-20 20:19:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2019-05-20 14:09:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> What I'd like, for both prove and pg_regress, is to print something
> >> about failing tests and otherwise be quiet. Simple redirection won't
> >> do that. Plus it'd
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2019-05-20 14:09:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What I'd like, for both prove and pg_regress, is to print something
>> about failing tests and otherwise be quiet. Simple redirection won't
>> do that. Plus it'd be hard to fit that in with the case where you
>> don't want
Hi,
On 2019-05-20 14:09:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2019-05-20 13:46:55 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> If there were a way to get prove to be absolutely quiet (its --quiet is
> >> a joke unfortunately), I'd lobby for a switch to make pg_regress quiet
> >> too. The amoun
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2019-05-20 13:46:55 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If there were a way to get prove to be absolutely quiet (its --quiet is
>> a joke unfortunately), I'd lobby for a switch to make pg_regress quiet
>> too. The amount of useless noise this recipe generates is annoying,
>> and
Hi,
On 2019-05-20 13:46:55 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2019-05-21 01:43:35 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> >> Thanks for the commit! And sorry, make check-world took very long time
> >> and has just finished right now in my env... I'd like to confirm that
> >> make check-wor
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2019-05-21 01:43:35 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> Thanks for the commit! And sorry, make check-world took very long time
>> and has just finished right now in my env... I'd like to confirm that
>> make check-world reports no error just in case.
> make -j16 -s && make -Ot
Hi,
On 2019-05-21 01:43:35 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 1:36 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2019-05-21 01:03:06 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:43 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Fujii Masao writes:
> > > > > Make VACUUM accept 1 and 0 as a b
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 1:36 AM Andres Freund wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-05-21 01:03:06 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:43 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > > Fujii Masao writes:
> > > > Make VACUUM accept 1 and 0 as a boolean value.
> > >
> > > This was not a particularly gr
Hi,
On 2019-05-21 01:03:06 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:43 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Fujii Masao writes:
> > > Make VACUUM accept 1 and 0 as a boolean value.
> >
> > This was not a particularly great thing to be pushing on a release
> > wrap day, and pushing it without
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:43 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Fujii Masao writes:
> > Make VACUUM accept 1 and 0 as a boolean value.
>
> This was not a particularly great thing to be pushing on a release
> wrap day, and pushing it without having even run the core regression
> tests was downright negligent
Fujii Masao writes:
> Make VACUUM accept 1 and 0 as a boolean value.
This was not a particularly great thing to be pushing on a release
wrap day, and pushing it without having even run the core regression
tests was downright negligent. Please fix or revert, NOW.
regards,
Make VACUUM accept 1 and 0 as a boolean value.
Commit 41b54ba78e allowed existing VACUUM options to take a boolean
argument. It's documented that valid boolean values that VACUUM can
accept are true, false, on, off, 1, and 0. But previously the parser
failed to accept 1 and 0 as a boolean value in
21 matches
Mail list logo