Re: Common case not at all clear

2021-09-19 Thread David G. Johnston
On Sunday, September 19, 2021, Anthony Berglas wrote: > > I note that nothing has happened. > > In future I would suggest that you simply tell people that document > updates are not really welcome. Otherwise you waste people's time. > That isn’t generally true, and as I am not an Oracle my abili

Re: Common case not at all clear

2021-09-19 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 8:04 AM PG Doc comments form wrote: > For all this documentation, it is completely unclear how to handle the most > common, simple case. I.e. > > Select balance into :bal ...where key =123; > Update set balance = :bal+100 where key = 100 I don't think that that's the mos

Re: Common case not at all clear

2021-09-19 Thread Anthony Berglas
Hello David, I note that nothing has happened. In future I would suggest that you simply tell people that document updates are not really welcome. Otherwise you waste people's time. The locking issue is actually quite serious. Cheers, Anthony On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 10:01 AM Anthony Berglas

Re: Some inconsistencies in release-14

2021-09-19 Thread Alexander Lakhin
Hello Tom, 19.09.2021 22:43, Tom Lane wrote: > Alexander Lakhin writes: >> While translating names in the acknowledgment section, I've found >> inconsistent spelling of several names. > I believe we've standardized on given-name-first in these lists. > (There was some discussion around that when t

Re: Some inconsistencies in release-14

2021-09-19 Thread Tom Lane
Alexander Lakhin writes: > While translating names in the acknowledgment section, I've found > inconsistent spelling of several names. I believe we've standardized on given-name-first in these lists. (There was some discussion around that when the first such lists were made, see [1].) People fro

Some inconsistencies in release-14

2021-09-19 Thread Alexander Lakhin
Hello hackers, While translating names in the acknowledgment section, I've found inconsistent spelling of several names. 1) Dong Wook vs Lee Dong Wook Dong Wook mentioned in 64fe120b (with e-mail sh95...@gmail.com) Dong Wook Lee mentioned in 64725728 https://postgr.es/m/caacbyajsgrb-qc-alb0malpr

Re: Typos in 34.3.9. Truncating a Large Object

2021-09-19 Thread Tom Lane
PG Doc comments form writes: > The first parameter for both lo_truncate and lo_truncate64 is missing an > "N", it says "PGcon *conn", but should be "PGconn *conn". Good catch! Will fix, thanks. regards, tom lane

Typos in 34.3.9. Truncating a Large Object

2021-09-19 Thread PG Doc comments form
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/lo-interfaces.html Description: The first parameter for both lo_truncate and lo_truncate64 is missing an "N", it says "PGcon *conn", but should be "PGconn *conn".