Thomas F. O'Connell wrote:
> What would people think of adding a note to the ROW SHARE section of
> Table-Level Locks remarking on the fact that referential integrity
> checks expressed through foreign keys do SELECT ... FOR UPDATES.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/explicit-
> l
That's funny. I went straight to Beta Information and completely
bypassed Testing... :)
Thanks!
--
Thomas F. O'Connell
Co-Founder, Information Architect
Sitening, LLC
Strategic Open Source: Open Your i™
http://www.sitening.com/
110 30th Avenue North, Suite 6
Nashville, TN 37203-6320
615-260-
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 03:32:28PM -0500, Thomas F. O'Connell wrote:
>
> There used to be a link to a built development version of the docs on
> the old developer site. Anyone know where that has gone?
>From http://www.postgresql.org/ the link is under Developers -> Testing.
--
Michael Fuhr
ht
There used to be a link to a built development version of the docs on the old developer site. Anyone know where that has gone?It's still mentioned at techdocs, but I don't see it in the Beta section of the website. -- Thomas F. O'Connell Co-Founder, Information Architect Sitening, LLC Strategic Op
What would people think of adding a note to the ROW SHARE section of Table-Level Locks remarking on the fact that referential integrity checks expressed through foreign keys do SELECT ... FOR UPDATES.http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/explicit-locking.html#LOCKING-TABLESIt was somewhat chall
