On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 at 20:18, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 6:18 AM Dean Rasheed wrote:
> > Overall, I'm quite happy with these results. The question is, should
> > this be back-patched?
> >
> > In the past, I think I've only back-patched numeric bug-fixes where
> > the digits ou
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 6:18 AM Dean Rasheed wrote:
> Overall, I'm quite happy with these results. The question is, should
> this be back-patched?
>
> In the past, I think I've only back-patched numeric bug-fixes where
> the digits output by the old code were incorrect or an error was
> thrown, no
[Moving this to -hackers]
> On 13/10/2022 18:20 CEST Adrian Klaver wrote:
> > select power(10, -18::numeric);
> > power
> >
> > 0.
> >
On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 at 18:17, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> An inexact result isn't surprising, but it shouldn't be *that* inexact.
>
