On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 04:43:37PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> I tried to move the partitioning-related code to a new file, and it wasn't
> too bad. Note that there are a couple of internal-to-tablecmds.c things
> that need to be exported. Besides that, the attached patch is still pretty
> rou
> On Dec 2, 2025, at 06:43, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 01:59:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I didn't do any math about it, but that's got to be a far faster rate
>> of expansion than the overall PG code base. Maybe partitioning is
>> largely to blame? Perhaps analyzing
Hi,
On 2025-12-01 11:25:13 -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> This file has over 22,000 lines and is too large to be included in GitHub's
> code search results [0]. It appears to have been given its current form in
> 2002 by commit 71dc300. Previously, it was named command.c, which dates
> back to t
On 2025-Dec-01, Tom Lane wrote:
> I didn't do any math about it, but that's got to be a far faster rate
> of expansion than the overall PG code base. Maybe partitioning is
> largely to blame? Perhaps analyzing what functionality got added
> here in the past dozen or so years would yield some ide
On Mon, Dec 1, 2025, at 3:18 PM, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> My first thought would be to move code that deals with catalog changes
> to files in catalog/. Also a couple of functions related to tablespaces
> could be perhaps be moved to commands/tablespace.c.
>
As Tom said partitioning has a big chun
=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera writes:
> On 2025-Dec-01, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> This file has over 22,000 lines and is too large to be included in GitHub's
>> code search results [0]. It appears to have been given its current form in
>> 2002 by commit 71dc300. Previously, it was named command
On 2025-Dec-01, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> This file has over 22,000 lines and is too large to be included in GitHub's
> code search results [0]. It appears to have been given its current form in
> 2002 by commit 71dc300. Previously, it was named command.c, which dates
> back to the 80s. Is it tim
