Hi again,
> I'm pretty sure this change is fine too, but I added the patch to the
> CF application in order to play it safe. Let's see what cfbot will
> tell us.
I see a little race condition happen :) Sorry for this.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
Hi Daniel,
> Thanks for looking! On closer inspection, I found another function which was
> never used and which doesn't turn up when searching extensions. The attached
> removes pgp_get_cipher_name as well.
I'm pretty sure this change is fine too, but I added the patch to the
CF application in
> On 30 Aug 2022, at 14:39, Aleksander Alekseev
> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
>> it seems we can consider retiring them in v16.
>
> Looks good to me. A link to the discussion was added to the patch.
Thanks for looking! On closer inspection, I found another function which was
never used and which
Hi Daniel,
> it seems we can consider retiring them in v16.
Looks good to me. A link to the discussion was added to the patch.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
v2-0001-pgcrypto-Remove-unused-mbuf-code.patch
Description: Binary data
mbuf_tell and mbuf_rewind functions were introduced in commit e94dd6ab91 but
were seemingly never used, so it seems we can consider retiring them in v16.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
v1-0001-pgcrypto-Remove-unused-mbuf-code.patch
Description: Binary data
