Re: Tom Lane
> Yeah, seems quite bogus. It's harmless though, so I don't
> see a need to back-patch, do you?
Other than it being confusing, it doesn't hurt.
Christoph
pgxs.mk is cleaning up a file "regress.def" if PORTNAME=win, but the
only reference to that file I could find is in the original commit
from 1999 adding that "rm" rule (and several commits moving the rule
around later).
Given that the PORTNAME is wrong (should be win32), it's probably safe
to just
Christoph Berg writes:
> Re: Tom Lane
>> Yeah, seems quite bogus. It's harmless though, so I don't
>> see a need to back-patch, do you?
> Other than it being confusing, it doesn't hurt.
OK, applied to master only.
regards, tom lane
Christoph Berg writes:
> pgxs.mk is cleaning up a file "regress.def" if PORTNAME=win, but the
> only reference to that file I could find is in the original commit
> from 1999 adding that "rm" rule (and several commits moving the rule
> around later).
> Given that the PORTNAME is wrong (should be
