On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 09:26 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Hopefully you're planning to keep that part, as it
> would be a shame if I had done it for nothing.
Not promising anything in that regard, but I appreciate your efforts to
assist. I doubt it was wasted effort in any sense. It will certainl
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 09:26 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 22:22 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> > I propose we just accept that both max_connections and
> >> > max_prepared_transactions nee
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 22:22 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> > I propose we just accept that both max_connections and
>> > max_prepared_transactions need to be set correctly for recovery to work.
>> > This will make the
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 01:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs writes:
> > On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 22:22 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >>> I propose we just accept that both max_connections and
> >>> max_prepared_transactions need to be set correctly for recovery to w
Simon Riggs writes:
> On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 22:22 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>> I propose we just accept that both max_connections and
>>> max_prepared_transactions need to be set correctly for recovery to work.
>>> This will make the state transitions more robust and
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 22:22 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I propose we just accept that both max_connections and
> > max_prepared_transactions need to be set correctly for recovery to work.
> > This will make the state transitions more robust and it will avoid
> > spuri
Simon Riggs wrote:
> I propose we just accept that both max_connections and
> max_prepared_transactions need to be set correctly for recovery to work.
> This will make the state transitions more robust and it will avoid
> spurious and hard to test error messages.
>
> Any objections to me removing
We discussed earlier that HS should continue to work even if
max_connections was set differently on the primary and the standby. This
now gives a situation where snapshots can be allowed, then disallowed
for a while, then allowed again.
Complication is that this will cause some connections to fai
