Thanks for committing the fix!
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Michael Paquier escribió:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Please find attached a simple example of bgworker that logs a message
> each
> > time a SIGTERM or SIGHUP signal is received by it:
> > - "hello signal: processed
Michael Paquier escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find attached a simple example of bgworker that logs a message each
> time a SIGTERM or SIGHUP signal is received by it:
> - "hello signal: processed SIGHUP" when SIGHUP is handled by my example
> - "hello signal: processed SIGTERM" when SIGTERM is ha
Michael Paquier escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> While playing with custom background workers, I noticed that postmaster
> does not notify its registered bgworkers if it receives SIGHUP,
> so you have to send a SIGHUP directly to the bgworker process to notify it.
> Signal handling is correctly done for SI
Hi all,
Please find attached a simple example of bgworker that logs a message each
time a SIGTERM or SIGHUP signal is received by it:
- "hello signal: processed SIGHUP" when SIGHUP is handled by my example
- "hello signal: processed SIGTERM" when SIGTERM is handled by my example
With the current
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Euler Taveira escribió:
> > On 21-03-2013 05:06, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > While playing with custom background workers, I noticed that
> postmaster does
> > > not notify its registered bgworkers if it receives SIGHUP,
> > > so you have
Euler Taveira escribió:
> On 21-03-2013 05:06, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > While playing with custom background workers, I noticed that postmaster does
> > not notify its registered bgworkers if it receives SIGHUP,
> > so you have to send a SIGHUP directly to the bgworker process to notify it.
> > S
On 21-03-2013 05:06, Michael Paquier wrote:
> While playing with custom background workers, I noticed that postmaster does
> not notify its registered bgworkers if it receives SIGHUP,
> so you have to send a SIGHUP directly to the bgworker process to notify it.
> Signal handling is correctly done f
Hi all,
While playing with custom background workers, I noticed that postmaster
does not notify its registered bgworkers if it receives SIGHUP,
so you have to send a SIGHUP directly to the bgworker process to notify it.
Signal handling is correctly done for SIGQUIT and SIGTERM for shutdown only.
A
