Re: [PATCHES] more improvements to release notes

2003-10-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Neil Conway wrote: > On Sun, 2003-10-26 at 00:50, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Make MOVE/FETCH 0 now does nothing > >(Bruce) > > Still wrong :-) "Make ... now does nothing" is ungrammatical. > > The other modified entry is incorrect for the same reason ("Cause ... > now returns"). Fixed

Re: [PATCHES] more improvements to release notes

2003-10-26 Thread Neil Conway
On Sun, 2003-10-26 at 00:50, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Make MOVE/FETCH 0 now does nothing > (Bruce) Still wrong :-) "Make ... now does nothing" is ungrammatical. The other modified entry is incorrect for the same reason ("Cause ... now returns"). -Neil ---(

Re: [PATCHES] more improvements to release notes

2003-10-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
Neil Conway wrote: > On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 13:26, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > * Cause FETCH 1 to return the next cursor row, or zero if at > > > > >beginning/end of cursor, per SQL spec (Bruce) > > That's better, but still wrong: what does it m

Re: [PATCHES] more improvements to release notes

2003-10-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Neil Conway wrote: > On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 13:26, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > * Cause FETCH 1 to return the next cursor row, or zero if at > > > > >beginning/end of cursor, per SQL spec (Bruce) > > That's better, but still wrong: what does it m

Re: [PATCHES] more improvements to release notes

2003-10-22 Thread Neil Conway
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 13:26, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > * Cause FETCH 1 to return the next cursor row, or zero if at > > >beginning/end of cursor, per SQL spec (Bruce) That's better, but still wrong: what does it mean for FETCH 1 to "return zero

Re: [PATCHES] more improvements to release notes

2003-10-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Neil Conway wrote: > This entry is plainly wrong: > > * Cause FETCH 1 to return the current cursor row, or zero if at >beginning/end of cursor, per SQL spec (Bruce) > > FETCH 0 is what actually returns the current cursor row, and returning > "zero" when a row value is expected wouldn

Re: [PATCHES] more improvements to release notes

2003-10-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Neil Conway wrote: > This patch makes a bunch of improvements to the release notes. I only > modified release.sgml -- HISTORY will need to be regenerated. > > I was able to remove almost all of the "Other uncategorized" release > note entries, but left a few that I wasn't sure what to do with. We

[PATCHES] more improvements to release notes

2003-10-21 Thread Neil Conway
This patch makes a bunch of improvements to the release notes. I only modified release.sgml -- HISTORY will need to be regenerated. I was able to remove almost all of the "Other uncategorized" release note entries, but left a few that I wasn't sure what to do with. We should remove this section, a