-> Seq Scan on tt_cfg cfg
(cost=0.00..1.01 rows=1 width=17) (actual time=0.018..0.019 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using pk_pla on tt_pla vencodpgt (cost=0.00..0.30 rows=1
width=24) (actual time=0.075..0.076 rows=1 loops=256)
Index Cond: ((ven
using the default join_collapse_limit?
Thank you in advance!
Reimer
> -Mensagem original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nome de Carlos H.
> Reimer
> Enviada em: quarta-feira, 1 de agosto de 2007 21:26
> Para: Alvaro Herrera
> Cc: Tom Lane; pgsql-perfo
x27;::bpchar)
-> Seq Scan on tt_pla vencodpgt (cost=0.00..2.18 rows=18 width=24)
(actual time=0.002..0.017 rows=18 loops=256)
Total runtime: 9546.971 ms
(46 rows)
> -Mensagem original-
> De: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviada em: quarta-feira, 1 de ag
t = vencodpgt.filpgt) AND (ven.codpgt =
vencodpgt.codpgt))
Total runtime: 1747122.219 ms
(43 rows)
The PG version is the 8.2.3.
Apparently the planner is not doing the correct choice by default, correct?
I could change the application and insert the set join_collapse_limit to 1
before the select
using pk_pla on tt_pla vencodpgt (cost=0.00..0.31 rows=1
width=24) (actual time=0.037..0.040 rows=1 loops=256)
Index Cond: ((ven.filpgt = vencodpgt.filpgt) AND (ven.codpgt =
vencodpgt.codpgt))
Total runtime: 1747122.219 ms
(43 rows)
____
_
Table and view definitions can be accessed at:
http://www.opendb.com.br/v1/problem0707.txt
Reimer
a on tt_pla vencodpgt (cost=0.00..0.31 rows=1
width=24) (actual time=0.037..0.040 rows=1 loops=256)
Index Cond: ((ven.filpgt = vencodpgt.filpgt) AND (ven.codpgt =
vencodpgt.codpgt))
Total runtime: 1747122.219 ms
(43 rows)
____
_
Table and view definitions can be accessed at:
http://www.opendb.com.br/v1/problem0707.txt
Reimer
y drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M
...
...
...
Thank you in advance!
Reimer
Reimer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenDB Serviços e Treinamentos PostgreSQL e DB2
Fone: 47 3327-0878 Cel: 47 9183-0547
www.opendb.com.br
Yes, casting the result improved the time response a lot.
Thank you!
Reimer
> -Mensagem original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nome de Tom Lane
> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 11 de janeiro de 2007 16:31
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc:
" btree (tipend)
"i_fk_end_dfil" btree (codfil)
"i_fk_end_dreg" btree (regiao)
"i_fk_end_mun" btree (codcid)
tt_log
Indexes:
"i_fk_log_bai" btree (codbai)
"i_lc_log_codcep" btree (codcep)
Any clue?
Thanks!
Reimer
> -M
| not null
\d tt_end
Table "TOTALL.tt_end"
Column | Type |Modifiers
+---+-----
...
...
...
codlog | character(3) |
...
...
...
codcep | character(5) |
...
...
Reimer
by day.
Reimer
> -Mensagem original-
> De: Mark Kirkwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2006 23:47
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
> Assunto: Re: [PERFORM] Bad iostat numbers
>
>
> Carlos
Hi,
I´ve taken a look in the /var/log/messages and found some temperature
messages about the disk drives:
Nov 30 11:08:07 totall smartd[1620]: Device: /dev/sda, Temperature changed 2
Celsius to 51 Celsius since last report
Can this temperature influence in the performance?
Reimer
de Channel B, SCSI Id=7, PCI 33 or 66Mhz, 512
SCBs
...
Reimer
ystem call affect i/o queue too?
Reimer
> -Mensagem original-
> De: Jim C. Nasby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviada em: domingo, 26 de novembro de 2006 22:52
> Para: Brad Nicholson
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
> Assunto: Re: [PERFORM] Pr
Hi,
We have an application that is mission critical, normally very fast, but
when an I/O or CPU bound transaction appears, the mission critical
application suffers. Is there a way go give some kind of priority to this
kind of application?
Reimer
shows is 1 but when the problem
occurs it goes to 25.
CPU and memory
usage are ok.
What can produce
this context switching storms?
It is a box with
12GB RAM and 4 processors running RedHat Enterprise Linux
AS.
Thank you in
advance!
Reimer[EMAIL PROT
es to 25.
CPU and memory
usage are ok.
What can produce
this context switching storms?
It is a box with
12GB RAM and 4 processors running RedHat Enterprise Linux
AS.
Thank you in
advance!
Reimer[EMAIL PROTECTED]OpenDB
Serviços e Treinamentos PostgreSQL e DB2Fone: 47 3327-0878 Ce
Fernando,
If you need to read all the table for example it would be better to read
only the data pages instead of read data and index pages.
Reimer
- Original Message -
From: "Fernando Lujan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 3:08 PM
Subject: [P
Marco,
Could you give us the query you would like to improve performance?
- Original Message -
From: "Marco Furetto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 11:59 AM
Subject: [PERFORM] Query Feromance
Hello!
Can I Increment the perfomance of execution query?
Where i
Andre, Could not Postgresql file cache being killed by firebird activity?Haven´t you tried decrease ramdom_page_cost to 3 or 2?It would be better if only one person will make configuration changes, otherwise it will be difficult to measure each configuration change impact.ReimerAndre Felipe Mac
Andre, I noticed that enable_bitmapscan and enable_seqscan are off, is there a reason for it? Have you tried with enable_bitmapscan on? How much RAM do you have? What kind of disks are being used? Beste regards, Reimer 55-47-33270878 Blumenau - SC - Brazil andremachado <[EM
seconds than making changes in database structure or SQL syntax.
How could I discover who is using the 7 remaining seconds? Network? ODBC? Application?
Thanks in advance!
Reimer
__Converse com seus amigos em tempo real com o Yahoo! Messenger
Hi,
I´m trying to tune a linux box with a 12 GB database and 4 GB RAM. First of all I would like to stop the swapping, so the shared_buffers and sort_mem were decreased but even so it started swapping two hours after DBMS started up.
I would like to know some suggestions how to discover why is
I forgot to say that it´s a 12GB database...
Ok, I´ll set shared buffers to 30.000 pages but even so "meminfo" and "top" shouldn´t show some shared pages?
I heard something about that Redhat 9 can´t handle very well RAM higher than 2GB. Is it right?
Thanks in advance!
Hi,
I´ve configured postgresql to use 1GB of shared buffers but meminfo and "top" are indicanting 0 shared buffers page. Why?
It´s a Linux Redhat 9 box with 4GB RAM and postgresql 7.3.
Thanks in advance!
Reimer
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis: Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador agora!
25 matches
Mail list logo