On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 11:40:17AM -0400, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > Whatever the case, the database still slows down to a halt after a month or
> > so, and I have to go in and shut everything down and do a VACUUM FULL by
> > hand. One index (of many many) takes 2000 seconds to vacuum. The whole
> > p
Hi Rod,
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 11:40:17AM -0400, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > Whatever the case, the database still slows down to a halt after a month or
> > so, and I have to go in and shut everything down and do a VACUUM FULL by
> > hand. One index (of many many) takes 2000 seconds to vacuum. The wh
Max Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been having problems maintaining the speed of the database in the
> long run. VACUUMs of the main tables happen a few times a day after maybe
> 50,000 or less rows are added and deleted (say 6 times a day).
> I have a whole lot (probably too much) inde
> Whatever the case, the database still slows down to a halt after a month or
> so, and I have to go in and shut everything down and do a VACUUM FULL by
> hand. One index (of many many) takes 2000 seconds to vacuum. The whole
> process takes a few hours.
Do a REINDEX on that table instead, and r
Hi Folks,
This is my _4th_ time trying to post this, me and the mailing list software
are fighting. I think it's because of the attachments so I'll just put
links to them instead. All apologies if this gets duplicated.
I've been having problems maintaining the speed of the database in the
long
