On 28 January 2011 10:53, Daniel Convissor
wrote:
> A quick reminder that one thing that seemed to be agreed upon during the
> last discussion is that mentions of older versions in the text (like
> "available since") should be moved to the change log on the given page.
I think that's a good gener
Hi Folks:
A quick reminder that one thing that seemed to be agreed upon during the
last discussion is that mentions of older versions in the text (like
"available since") should be moved to the change log on the given page.
Thanks,
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S
Maybe Phillip would have something to add to this conversation :) ?
J.Pauli
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Julien Pauli wrote:
> Good idea Stas. We could do some greping or php scripting to look for
> PHP4 references and move them all to a file/chapter.
>
> Perhaps that is a good idea to sta
Good idea Stas. We could do some greping or php scripting to look for
PHP4 references and move them all to a file/chapter.
Perhaps that is a good idea to start writing a manual that could make
it easy in the future by adding some custom DocBook tags that would be
easy to fetch, like This feature
On 15 January 2011 23:46, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 05:52, Julien Pauli wrote:
>>
>> Last time (http://marc.info/?l=phpdoc&m=128686832705180&w=2) , we
>> suggested that [old-and-not-supported-versions] = PHP4 + PHP5.0 +
>> PHP5.1 ; and [up-to-date-versions] = PHP5.2 + PHP5.3
>
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 13:46, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> I think we should only get rid of<< php 5.0.
>
> I wonder if it would be possible to generate the PHP 4 manual and have it
> sitting somewhere separate and the same thing for 5.0 and 5.1?
That would actually be a good practice fo
Hi!
I think we should only get rid of<< php 5.0.
I wonder if it would be possible to generate the PHP 4 manual and have
it sitting somewhere separate and the same thing for 5.0 and 5.1?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
I think we should only get rid of << php 5.0.
If it is possible a sample old and new page should be created that
shows how the normal process of changes should follow in the
documentation.
Regards,
Pedram
On 1/16/11, Alexey Shein wrote:
> 2011/1/15 Daniel Brown :
>> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 05:5
2011/1/15 Daniel Brown :
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 05:52, Julien Pauli wrote:
>>
>> Last time (http://marc.info/?l=phpdoc&m=128686832705180&w=2) , we
>> suggested that [old-and-not-supported-versions] = PHP4 + PHP5.0 +
>> PHP5.1 ; and [up-to-date-versions] = PHP5.2 + PHP5.3
>
> -1
>
> Gettin
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 05:52, Julien Pauli wrote:
>
> Last time (http://marc.info/?l=phpdoc&m=128686832705180&w=2) , we
> suggested that [old-and-not-supported-versions] = PHP4 + PHP5.0 +
> PHP5.1 ; and [up-to-date-versions] = PHP5.2 + PHP5.3
-1
Getting rid of PHP4, sure, but I think it
First, this topic could be the following of
http://marc.info/?l=phpdoc&m=128686832705180&w=2 , I suggest everyone
not in touch with it to read it carefully.
I started a new one to make things go faster, as I consider that
subject having slept enought by now.
The subject is clear : clean the offic
11 matches
Mail list logo
