Re: Daniel Kahn Gillmor 2014-03-05 <53170e24.9000...@fifthhorseman.net>
> This would definitely require coordination from postgresql upstream,
> though. i don't think the postgres binary supports this yet. it might
It certainly doesn't.
> be worth raising to upstream at some point though. sock
On 03/05/2014 09:50 AM, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Daniel Kahn Gillmor 2014-03-04 <531641aa.7040...@fifthhorseman.net>
>> have you looked at all into the idea of a socket-activated postgresql
>> for those initsystems that can handle socket activation?
>
> I think it would be a nice idea, but woul
Re: Daniel Kahn Gillmor 2014-03-04 <531641aa.7040...@fifthhorseman.net>
> >> To work, you also need the pg_ctlcluster version from HEAD.
> >> pg_ctlcluster now invokes postgres directly so it runs in foreground
> >> instead of daemonizing with pg_ctl - this seems more like the systemd
> >> way to d
