Hi Christoph--
On Fri 2018-03-02 14:00:52 +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> this is very interesting, especially Type=notify.
thanks for taking a look!
> my first question would be if we could integrate the idea more tightly
> with the existing postgresql@ services which are already capable of
> la
The previous patch had a small error in it ("psql" in one instance where
i'd otherwise settled on "postgres"). I'm attaching a revised patch
that doesn't have that problem.
--dkg
>From d88b1d641066aa9299beba5e84c47d22ded5337e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 200
the approach in the attached patch offers a different user-owned cluster
*per instantiated template*.
This keeps the data for each invoked database localized, within that
named directory in ~/.config/foo.
Another approach would be to have a single
/usr/lib/systemd/user/postgresql.service that run
e mode 100755
index 000..f89666e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/postgres-user-cluster
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+
+# Author: Daniel Kahn Gillmor
+# Date: 2018-02-27
+
+# /usr/share/postgresql-common/postgres-user-cluster DBNAME DBPATH SOCKETDIR
+
+# Launch a private postgresql cluster (setting it up
Package: postgresql
Version: 9.6+184
Severity: normal
I'm running postgresql 9.6 in a minimal virtual machine (with systemd
as pid 1), where nothing else is writing to /var/log (with the
exception of systemd-journald, when configured for non-ephemeral
logging).
however, the postgresql 9.6-main cl
Hi Christoph--
On Fri 2016-11-11 17:48:53 +0900, Christoph Berg wrote:
> PG is not going to be an embedded database, so there will never be
> something like a libpostgresql that you could link to and have the DB
> "inside" your program. It will always be a (set of) separate
> processes. Which mean
Hi Debian PostgreSQL folks--
Thre are some circumstances where i'd like to have the postgresql
binaries available without necessarily needing the system services
installed and started. For example, i have a set of intermittent
short-lived processes that need to share long-lived state. The state
On Fri 2016-06-10 20:29:55 -0400, peter green wrote:
> About a week ago I upgraded a server from wheezy to jessie. After the OS
> upgrade I upgraded from postgresql 9.1 to 9.4 using pg_updatecluster. It
> took a couple of attempts with pg_updatecluster to get things right
> (mainly because I was
On 03/05/2014 09:50 AM, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Daniel Kahn Gillmor 2014-03-04 <531641aa.7040...@fifthhorseman.net>
>> have you looked at all into the idea of a socket-activated postgresql
>> for those initsystems that can handle socket activation?
>
> I think i
On 03/04/2014 06:49 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Christoph Berg (m...@debian.org) wrote:
>> I've written systemd unit files for managing PostgreSQL clusters.
>
> Neat stuff!
seconded!
>> To work, you also need the pg_ctlcluster version from HEAD.
>> pg_ctlcluster now invokes postgres directly s
10 matches
Mail list logo
