Your message dated Sun, 24 Feb 2019 15:45:50 +0900
with message-id <8736odr8f5.wl-uwab...@gfd-dennou.org>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #917685,
regarding ruby-rack: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.5" failed.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
FYI: The status of the ruby-fix-trinity-output source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.0.0-1
Current version: 1.0.0-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day
FYI: The status of the ruby-threach source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.2.0-1
Current version: 0.2.0-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will re
FYI: The status of the ruby-fog-rackspace source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.1.6-1
Current version: 0.1.6-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you w
FYI: The status of the ruby-fixwhich source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.0.2-1
Current version: 1.0.2-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will r
FYI: The status of the ruby-markdown-it-html5-embed source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.0.0+dfsg-1
Current version: 1.0.0+dfsg-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multip
FYI: The status of the ruby-sinon-rails source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.9.0-1
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: Package not in unstable
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney h
ruby-jquery-atwho-rails 1.3.2-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
2019-03-06
It is affected by these RC bugs:
918611: ruby-jquery-atwho-rails: ruby-jquery-atwho-rails FTBFS with rails 5.2
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-e
Your message dated Sun, 24 Feb 2019 00:34:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#921637: fixed in ruby-ronn 0.8.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #921637,
regarding ronn 0.8.0-1 breaks man pages with numbered lists
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 17:43:39 -0600
Source: ruby-ronn
Architecture: source
Version: 0.8.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
Changed-By: Stephen Gelman
Closes: 921637
Chan
ruby-ronn_0.8.0-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ruby-ronn_0.8.0-2.dsc
ruby-ronn_0.8.0-2.debian.tar.xz
ruby-ronn_0.8.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
__
ruby-ronn_0.8.0-2.dsc: Invalid size hash for ruby-ronn_0.8.0.orig.tar.gz:
According to the control file the size hash should be 66605,
but ruby-ronn_0.8.0.orig.tar.gz has 66599.
If you did not include ruby-ronn_0.8.0.orig.tar.gz in your upload, a different
version
might already be known to the
ruby-ronn_0.8.0-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ruby-ronn_0.8.0-2.dsc
ruby-ronn_0.8.0-2.debian.tar.xz
ruby-ronn_0.8.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
__
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 921637 + confirmed pending
Bug #921637 [ronn] ronn 0.8.0-1 breaks man pages with numbered lists
Added tag(s) confirmed and pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
921637: https://bugs.debian.
Control: tags + confirmed pending
On 19-02-23 20:24:15, brian m. carlson wrote:
> It would be great if we could get this patch into buster. [...]
Upload, including the patch, upcoming in the next days.
Cheers,
Georg
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_
Your message dated Sat, 23 Feb 2019 21:34:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#919516: fixed in ruby2.5 2.5.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #919516,
regarding ruby2.5 ftbfs in testing/unstable: certificate verify failed
(certificate has expired)
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 17:51:21 -0300
Source: ruby2.5
Architecture: source
Version: 2.5.3-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Team
Changed-By: Antonio Terceiro
Closes: 919516
Changes:
ruby2.5
ruby2.5_2.5.3-4_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ruby2.5_2.5.3-4.dsc
ruby2.5_2.5.3-4.debian.tar.xz
ruby2.5_2.5.3-4_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 09:55:16PM -0500, Andrew Janke wrote:
> I've confirmed this is the https://github.com/apjanke/ronn-ng/issues/24 bug
> in ronn-ng.
>
> It looks liike an easy fix and I have pushed a ronn-ng 0.8.1.beta.1
> gem/release with the fix. Are you able to test against a prerelease ge
Your message dated Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:33:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#922872: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #745145,
regarding libjs-sinon: Section should be web instead of ruby
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:33:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#922872: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #835509,
regarding ruby-sinon-rails: should depend on libjs-sinon
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:33:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#922872: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #832240,
regarding libjs-sinon: Section should not be “ruby”
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:33:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#922872: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #884745,
regarding libjs-sinon: new upstream version “4.1.3”
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:31:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#922837: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #918403,
regarding ruby-rack-pjax FTBFS with ruby-rack 2.0.6-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
libjs-sinon |1.9.0-1 | all
ruby-sinon-rails |1.9.0-1 | source, all
--- Reason ---
ROM; no longer required, no reverse dependencies
-
Your message dated Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:32:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#922868: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #918260,
regarding ruby-protected-attributes: Depends: ruby-activemodel (< 2:5.0) but
2:5.2.0+dfsg-2 is to be installed
to be marked as
Version: 1.9.0-1+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package ruby-sinon-rails has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/9228
Your message dated Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:32:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#922868: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #861459,
regarding ruby-protected-attributes: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:31:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#922836: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #900178,
regarding ruby-rails-admin: CVE-2017-12098
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:32:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#922843: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #912142,
regarding ruby-capybara-screenshot FTBFS: test failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Version: 1.1.4-2+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package ruby-protected-attributes has just been removed from the Debian
archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debia
Your message dated Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:31:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#922836: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #891716,
regarding ruby-rails-admin FTBFS: Could not find 'kaminari' (~> 0.14) - did
find: [kaminari-1.0.1]
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:31:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#922836: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #903855,
regarding CVE-2016-10522
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
ruby-protected-attributes |1.1.4-2 | source, all
--- Reason ---
ROM; obsolete with rails 5, no reverse dependencies
Version: 1.0.14-1+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package ruby-capybara-screenshot has just been removed from the Debian
archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debia
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
ruby-rails-admin | 0.8.1+dfsg-3 | source, all
--- Reason ---
ROM; not required, no reverse dependencies, rc buggy
--
Version: 0.7.0-2+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package ruby-rack-pjax has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922837
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
ruby-capybara-screenshot | 1.0.14-1 | source, all
--- Reason ---
ROM; no longer used,no reverse dependencies, rc buggy
---
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
ruby-rack-pjax |0.7.0-2 | source, all
--- Reason ---
ROM; not required, rc buggy, only reverse dependency can also be removed
--
Version: 0.8.1+dfsg-3+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package ruby-rails-admin has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org
40 matches
Mail list logo
