On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > 1. Is it *safe* and *undeniably always correct* to mount the cgroupfs in
> >that mountpoint, with the mount options used in the patch?
> >
> >This answer needs only to take jessie into
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> 1. Is it *safe* and *undeniably always correct* to mount the cgroupfs in
>that mountpoint, with the mount options used in the patch?
>
>This answer needs only to take jessie into account. But it does
>need to consider jessie's
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
Your message has
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package sysvinit to fix the RC bug #768496 caused by a
typo in invoke-rc.d introduced in version 2.88dsf-56. It also include a
forgotten bug number added to the changelog (a
Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:49:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#768496: fixed in sysvinit 2.88dsf-58
has caused the Debian Bug report #768496,
regarding [invoke-rc.d] Typo in initctl which breaks upstart
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:34:18 +0100
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysvinit sysvinit-core sysvinit-utils sysv-rc initscripts bootlogd
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.88dsf-58
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer
sysvinit_2.88dsf-58_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
sysvinit_2.88dsf-58.dsc
sysvinit_2.88dsf-58.debian.tar.xz
sysvinit_2.88dsf-58_amd64.deb
sysvinit-core_2.88dsf-58_amd64.deb
sysvinit-utils_2.88dsf-58_amd64.deb
sysv-rc_2.88dsf-58_all.deb
initscri
Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:28:05 +0100
with message-id <2fl4mu5r0ze@diskless.uio.no>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#746795: sysvinit-utils: service
foo force-reload, under upstart should restart the service, nor reload
has caused the Debian Bug report #746795,
regard
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #694986 [initscripts] flash-kernel: postinst modifies /etc/default/rcS
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
694986: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694986
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
Version: 2.88dsf-56
This issue was fixed a while back. Closing it.
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
___
Pkg-sysvinit-devel mailing list
Pkg-sysvinit-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-sysvin
Control: severity -1 important
I'm not sure this is fixable, but I am sure it isn't release critical.
Reduce the severity to important to reflect this fact.
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
___
Pkg-sysvinit-devel mailing list
Pkg-sysvinit-devel@l
Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:22:12 +0100
with message-id <2fl7fz1r197@diskless.uio.no>
and subject line Re: [squeeze] urandom should be "started" in postinst
has caused the Debian Bug report #679977,
regarding [squeeze] urandom should be "started" in postinst
to be marked as done.
Th
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > On 10/29/2010 07:43 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > I like it. Is this mountpoint "blessed" by someone, since it is inside
> > > /sys? Are other distros also using this path?
> >
> > it's th
13 matches
Mail list logo
