Re: broken pl LC_TIME

2007-06-24 Thread Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
Tomasz Pala wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 07:46:27PM +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > > > > BTW, it is not my intention to prove that "17 XII 1999" is the only valid > > date format in pl. My intension is to prove that the statement claiming it > > is invalid for 30 years is simply fal

Re: NEW poldek 0.20070617.23 - please test

2007-06-24 Thread Michał Łukaszek
On 6/24/07, Michał Łukaszek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/19/07, Paweł A. Gajda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Fixed too, try new snap. > > Here's another one: And another: $ LC_ALL=C po -n th-i686 -n th-test-i686 Loading [pndir]th... Loading [pndir]th... Loading [pndir]th-test... Loading [

Re: NEW poldek 0.20070617.23 - please test

2007-06-24 Thread Michał Łukaszek
On 6/19/07, Paweł A. Gajda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fixed too, try new snap. Here's another one: poldek:/all-avail> desc p7zip Package:p7zip-4.47-1.x86_64 Summary:ów z najwyższym stopniem kompresji Group: Applications/Archiving License:LGPL Arch/OS/Color: x

Re: broken pl LC_TIME

2007-06-24 Thread Tomasz Pala
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 07:46:27PM +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > > BTW, it is not my intention to prove that "17 XII 1999" is the only valid > date format in pl. My intension is to prove that the statement claiming it > is invalid for 30 years is simply false. Not 'invalid' but archaic.