Michael,
Not everyone believes as you, and you of all people should understand that in
this country, ALL beliefs are valued. The beliefs you are defending so
adamantly are held by a minority of humans on the earth. When you allow others
to believe what they wish, you will find that your relatio
Danial,
I agree, however we have gone down this road a dozen times before... always
with the same individual. I am constantly on the edge of unsubscribing to
this mailing list, despite all the GOOD information that is on it. I have
found that the only way to deal with it is to have an autodelete
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 21:44 -0700, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 20:59, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
>
> > I'm unsure when this list became a religious or political debate forum but
> > last I checked this is a linux user group general mailing list. Can we drop
> > this argument sh
Well Bill, you are wrong where trying to harass me privately is still
harassment. At least by posting this on PLUG others can see that you
are clearly part of the problem and not part of the solution. If people
do leave this list, it will not be because I tried to logically and
respectfully argue
Michael,
There is a reason other lists kick you off.
I'm sorry you can't see it.
When you turn in a circle and everyone you see is wrong, perhaps it's
not them.
-Bill Ensley
On 9/27/2011 2:14 PM, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
> Not until I am afforded the same privileges and respect as Keith
> c
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 20:59, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> I'm unsure when this list became a religious or political debate forum but
> last I checked this is a linux user group general mailing list. Can we drop
> this argument shakehands and move on. There are better places and ways to
> addres
> I'm unsure when this list became a religious or political debate forum but
> last I checked this is a linux user group general mailing list. Can we drop
> this argument shakehands and move on. There are better places and ways to
> address such.
>
> - Benjamin Kerensa
> Team Lead
> Ubuntu Oreg
Not until I am afforded the same privileges and respect as Keith
concerning this argument. If Keith has a right to put blatant
and wrong religious statements on this Linux list, than anyone else
should have the right to disagree with him both openly and
intelligently. Disproportionately blaming
Hi Guys,
I'm unsure when this list became a religious or political debate forum but last
I checked this is a linux user group general mailing list. Can we drop this
argument shakehands and move on. There are better places and ways to address
such.
- Benjamin Kerensa
Team Lead
Ubuntu Oregon
Why is everything you do or say the fault of someone else ... do other
people control you to that extent?
What universal hot line are you plugged into that you are so very sure
of your knowledge?
It is irrelevant because the desperation for certainty insures desperate
uncertainty ... but I don'
With Keith's baiting of me to get others upset, why are you upset with
me??? I really do need help figuring out how to get FXS connected
telephone handsets to dial out. I can dial to them, but I can't dial
from them.
Just so everyone is clear, "God is a man." Second, He is the same God
as your
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:16:07AM -0700, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> Building an Asterisk system for my wife's office. 3 voice
> lines coming in. She Who Must Be Obeyed says, "no hook
> switch flash, no touch tones, I want lights and buttons".
>
> So - suggestions for IP phones to look at or avoi
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:39 -0700, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
> God is not a woman. God is a man, Mary's son, and Mary is his female
> mother. Calling God a woman is offensive to both me and Him. Please
> refrain from doing so again.
While I think Keith was just honoring his wife in a humorous
Michael C. Robinson wrote:
> (omissions for brevity) ... is offensive to both me and Him. Please
> refrain from doing so again.
>
Mickael K. Robenson
At the risk of adding my email to those quite properly ignored ...
How do you know what offends god ... oh, yeah, I answer my own
question,
God is not a woman. God is a man, Mary's son, and Mary is his female
mother. Calling God a woman is offensive to both me and Him. Please
refrain from doing so again.
> Building an Asterisk system for my wife's office. 3 voice
> lines coming in. She Who Must Be Obeyed says, "no hook
> switch f
I enjoy the Cisco 7940. And I have several of them available...
-wes
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> Building an Asterisk system for my wife's office. 3 voice
> lines coming in. She Who Must Be Obeyed says, "no hook
> switch flash, no touch tones, I want lights and b
Building an Asterisk system for my wife's office. 3 voice
lines coming in. She Who Must Be Obeyed says, "no hook
switch flash, no touch tones, I want lights and buttons".
So - suggestions for IP phones to look at or avoid?
This is temporary. Long term, I want to use headsets and computer
sc
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Michael C. Robinson <
plu...@robinson-west.com> wrote:
> So then, replacing 2.6.34 with 3.0.4 should work just fine?
> How about for CentOS 6 which is traditionally behind for stability
> reasons? Is 3.0.4 more stable than 2.6.34?
>
>
it's not that "replacing 2.6
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
> So then, replacing 2.6.34 with 3.0.4 should work just fine? How
> about for CentOS 6 which is traditionally behind for stability
> reasons? Is 3.0.4 more stable than 2.6.34?
Unless you have a direct need for new feature in 3.0.4, I'd recommend
So then, replacing 2.6.34 with 3.0.4 should work just fine?
How about for CentOS 6 which is traditionally behind for stability
reasons? Is 3.0.4 more stable than 2.6.34?
>
> > The Linux 3.0.4 kernel is the current kernel. What is changing from
> > the long running 2.6 series which has gotten u
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
> The Linux 3.0.4 kernel is the current kernel. What is changing from
> the long running 2.6 series which has gotten up around 2.6.40 or so?
The 3.0.x series is just an incremental upgrade from 2.6.x. Linus
wrote:
START QUOTE
So what a
Does anyone know what to add to extensions.conf in Asterisk 1.8 to allow
dialing from FXS connected devices?
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 00:19 -0700, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
> The Linux 3.0.4 kernel is the current kernel. What is changing from the
> long running 2.6 series which has gotten up around 2.6.40 or so?
>
> CentOS 6 unfortunately is down at the 2.6.34 kernel level. I'm curious
> if there are sta
The Linux 3.0.4 kernel is the current kernel. What is changing from the
long running 2.6 series which has gotten up around 2.6.40 or so?
CentOS 6 unfortunately is down at the 2.6.34 kernel level. I'm curious
if there are stability and/or other end of life issues for the 2.6
kernel?
Is it true t
I've been forced to move my static ip's to different ones because my ISP
got bought out. At PSU at least, my second web server xerxes is
apparently not being detected at the new number. I'm also noticing that
my posts to this list don't seem to be showing up.
25 matches
Mail list logo