I have two mailservers behind a firewall and they are on the same subnet e.g.
A: @test.sk 192.168.1.5
B: @test.eu 192.168.1.6
MX records in DNS on internet are e.g.
A: @test.sk 194.1.1.5
B: @test.eu 194.1.1.6
On the A server I have setup aliases file to forward mails to server B, but it
is not w
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 13:50 +1000, Barney Desmond wrote:
> You need to ask yourself if this is a real problem, or something
> you're just imagining. Mysql generally works fine, 50,000 messages a
> day at 12 queries each, equates to several queries per second. This is
> an "easy" load.
That is a co
2009/7/23 Clunk Werclick :
> On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 11:04 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
>> Clunk Werclick wrote:
>> > I think perhaps 4-12 queries per message is not optimal?
>> > If server handle 50,000 a day X 12 that is quite a lot? I don't think
>> > it is going to get may fields returned for .co.uk
On 7/22/2009 5:35 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, July 23, 2009 02:29, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Jul 22, 2009, at 7:28 PM, "Benny Pedersen" wrote:
On Thu, July 23, 2009 01:07, Sahil Tandon wrote:
% postconf message_strip_charters
postconf: warning: message_strip_charters: u
On Thu, July 23, 2009 02:29, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Jul 22, 2009, at 7:28 PM, "Benny Pedersen" wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, July 23, 2009 01:07, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>>
>>> % postconf message_strip_charters
>>> postconf: warning: message_strip_charters: unknown parameter
>>
>> be more helpfull then cr
On Jul 22, 2009, at 7:28 PM, "Benny Pedersen" wrote:
On Thu, July 23, 2009 01:07, Sahil Tandon wrote:
% postconf message_strip_charters
postconf: warning: message_strip_charters: unknown parameter
be more helpfull then critize my spellings
I did not know it was a misspelling. How could
On Thu, July 23, 2009 01:52, Joe wrote:
> Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> On Thu, July 23, 2009 01:07, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>>
>>
>>> % postconf message_strip_charters
>>> postconf: warning: message_strip_charters: unknown parameter
>>>
>>
>> be more helpfull then critize my spellings
>>
>
> Don't shoot t
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Thu, July 23, 2009 01:07, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>
>
>> % postconf message_strip_charters
>> postconf: warning: message_strip_charters: unknown parameter
>>
>
> be more helpfull then critize my spellings
>
Don't shoot the messenger - he pointed out, in good faith
On Thu, July 23, 2009 01:07, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> % postconf message_strip_charters
> postconf: warning: message_strip_charters: unknown parameter
be more helpfull then critize my spellings
--
xpoint
On Thu, July 23, 2009 01:04, d.h...@yournetplus.com wrote:
> It would seem you have misspelled the word 'characters' within the parameter.
my bad here, but my main.cf have not that spelling fail, i verified it
--
xpoint
On Thu, July 23, 2009 01:00, Noel Jones wrote:
> Did you run "postfix reload"?
yes
> Do you have postfix 2.3 or later?
2.5.7
> Show evidence. "postconf -n" output, contents of your
> message, etc.
do i really have to :/
--
xpoint
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Oscar Cruz wrote:
> Hi lately im having problem using postfix with a specific domain when i
> received its mails, my server shows the next message
>
> at first it seems like this: status=sent
Incomplete log report.
> but seconds later the log shows an error.
>
> status=bou
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Wed, July 22, 2009 23:14, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> > "be strict in what you send, liberal in what you accept"
>
> ok
>
> i try
>
> postconf -e 'message_strip_charters = \346'
% postconf message_strip_charters
postconf: warning: message_strip_charte
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, LuKreme wrote:
> On 21-Jul-2009, at 16:43, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>> On Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:16 AM +0200 Patrick Ben Koetter
>> wrote:
>>> These days OpenSSL is able to determine which random source it wants
>>> to
>>> use. This might explain why it is empty in a
Quoting Benny Pedersen :
On Wed, July 22, 2009 23:14, Noel Jones wrote:
"be strict in what you send, liberal in what you accept"
ok
i try
postconf -e 'message_strip_charters = \346'
still amavisd give this
Non-encoded 8-bit data (char E6 hex): Subject: \346
why does postfix not use my s
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, July 22, 2009 23:14, Noel Jones wrote:
"be strict in what you send, liberal in what you accept"
ok
i try
postconf -e 'message_strip_charters = \346'
still amavisd give this
Non-encoded 8-bit data (char E6 hex): Subject: \346
why does postfix not use my strip
On Wed, July 22, 2009 23:45, Noel Jones wrote:
> Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> what does others do if remote have a self signed ssl key, accept it ?
> Yes, accept it. Opportunistic TLS does not imply more trust
> than a non encrypted connection; you're willing to make a
> non-encrypted connection to
I have a Posix mail server that serves as a gateway to an MS Exange
server. The Posix server contains aliases (stored in openldap) that
match the users in the MS Exchange server. So somebody could send an
e-mail to j...@example.com (the MX register for example.com is my Posix
server), this would re
On Wed, July 22, 2009 23:14, Noel Jones wrote:
> "be strict in what you send, liberal in what you accept"
ok
i try
postconf -e 'message_strip_charters = \346'
still amavisd give this
Non-encoded 8-bit data (char E6 hex): Subject: \346
why does postfix not use my strip ?
--
xpoint
I have a Posix mail server that serves as a gateway to an MS Exange
server. The Posix server contains aliases (stored in openldap) that
match the users in the MS Exchange server. So somebody could send an
e-mail to j...@example.com (the MX register for example.com is my Posix
server), this would re
Hi lately im having problem using postfix with a specific domain when i
received its mails, my server shows the next message
at first it seems like this: status=sent
but seconds later the log shows an error.
status=bounced (data format error. Command output: user: Message contains
invalid heade
Benny Pedersen wrote:
what does others do if remote have a self signed ssl key, accept it ?
Yes, accept it. Opportunistic TLS does not imply more trust
than a non encrypted connection; you're willing to make a
non-encrypted connection to that client. TLS in this case
indicates encryption,
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, July 22, 2009 22:18, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sahil Tandon:
On Jul 22, 2009, at 4:06 PM, "Benny Pedersen" wrote:
On Wed, July 22, 2009 22:00, Noel Jones wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#strict_7bit_headers
if postfix changed defaults to yes, then i bel
On Wed, July 22, 2009 22:18, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Sahil Tandon:
>> On Jul 22, 2009, at 4:06 PM, "Benny Pedersen" wrote:
>> > On Wed, July 22, 2009 22:00, Noel Jones wrote:
>> >> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#strict_7bit_headers
>> > if postfix changed defaults to yes, then i belive pro
On Wed, July 22, 2009 22:12, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Jul 22, 2009, at 4:06 PM, "Benny Pedersen" wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, July 22, 2009 22:00, Noel Jones wrote:
>>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#strict_7bit_headers
>>
>> if postfix changed defaults to yes, then i belive problematic
>> send
Sahil Tandon:
> On Jul 22, 2009, at 4:06 PM, "Benny Pedersen" wrote:
>
> >
> > On Wed, July 22, 2009 22:00, Noel Jones wrote:
> >> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#strict_7bit_headers
> >
> > if postfix changed defaults to yes, then i belive problematic
> > senders would change there prob
On Jul 22, 2009, at 4:06 PM, "Benny Pedersen" wrote:
On Wed, July 22, 2009 22:00, Noel Jones wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#strict_7bit_headers
if postfix changed defaults to yes, then i belive problematic
senders would change there problem
Oh please. The functionality e
what does others do if remote have a self signed ssl key, accept it ?
--
xpoint
On Wed, July 22, 2009 22:00, Noel Jones wrote:
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#strict_7bit_headers
if postfix changed defaults to yes, then i belive problematic senders would
change there problem
php mail() is imho not mime compliant
--
xpoint
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, July 22, 2009 21:41, Noel Jones wrote:
At any rate, unless 8 bit characters in headers are causing
some specific problem, it's not worth blocking them.
back to my first question on how to
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#strict_7bit_headers
-- Noel Jo
On Wed, July 22, 2009 21:41, Noel Jones wrote:
> At any rate, unless 8 bit characters in headers are causing
> some specific problem, it's not worth blocking them.
back to my first question on how to
--
xpoint
Stefan Förster wrote:
* Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, July 22, 2009 17:50, Noel Jones wrote:
You could configure postfix to reject such mail, but then
you'll lose otherwise legit mail.
yes legit problem also
This is probably a stupid question, but are those characters really
allowed in emai
On Wed, July 22, 2009 21:27, Stefan Förster wrote:
> * Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> On Wed, July 22, 2009 17:50, Noel Jones wrote:
>>> You could configure postfix to reject such mail, but then
>>> you'll lose otherwise legit mail.
>> yes legit problem also
> This is probably a stupid question, but ar
thanks, that is what i'm looking for.
BR
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> oka...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Hello all.
>>
>> Is there any method to discard all mails coming to t...@test.com
>> except all mails coming from *...@test.com
>>
>> We want to not allow some accounts to r
On Wed, July 22, 2009 18:31, Robert Lopez wrote:
> Which postfix list would be best used for such a block? Could it be
> sender_access?
http://www.google.dk/search?q=sender_localpart+postfwd&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=com.ubuntu:da-DK:unofficial&client=firefox-a
--
xpoint
* Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Wed, July 22, 2009 17:50, Noel Jones wrote:
>> You could configure postfix to reject such mail, but then
>> you'll lose otherwise legit mail.
>
> yes legit problem also
This is probably a stupid question, but are those characters really
allowed in email headers?
Ci
On Wed, July 22, 2009 17:50, Noel Jones wrote:
> Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> i like to have postfix strip these chars in headers so amavisd does not
>> block the mails with bad header, well maybe it kill dkim
>> :/
>>
>> but is there better options ?
>>
>> reject and let senders solve it ?
>>
>
> Th
oka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all.
Is there any method to discard all mails coming to t...@test.com
except all mails coming from *...@test.com
We want to not allow some accounts to recieve emails from outside.
BR
Here's general instructions for this sort of thing:
http://www.postfix.org/REST
Hello all.
Is there any method to discard all mails coming to t...@test.com
except all mails coming from *...@test.com
We want to not allow some accounts to recieve emails from outside.
BR
* Robert Lopez :
> We get a lot of spam from a marketing company that uses hundreds of ip
> addresses and hundreds of domain names but it always comes from
> "support" at which ever names they are using that day.
How do you know it's from the same company?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich
--On Wednesday, July 22, 2009 7:28 AM -0600 LuKreme
wrote:
On 21-Jul-2009, at 16:43, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
On Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:16 AM +0200 Patrick Ben Koetter
wrote:
These days OpenSSL is able to determine which random source it
wants to
use. This might explain why it is emp
Robert Lopez wrote:
> We get a lot of spam from a marketing company that uses hundreds of ip
> addresses and hundreds of domain names but it always comes from
> "support" at which ever names they are using that day.
>
> My supervisor wants me to block all email coming from "supp...@*".
>
> I have c
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 10:31 -0600, Robert Lopez wrote:
> We get a lot of spam from a marketing company that uses hundreds of ip
> addresses and hundreds of domain names but it always comes from
> "support" at which ever names they are using that day.
>
> My supervisor wants me to block all email c
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:31:35 -0600, Robert Lopez
wrote:
> We get a lot of spam from a marketing company that uses hundreds of ip
> addresses and hundreds of domain names but it always comes from
> "support" at which ever names they are using that day.
>
> My supervisor wants me to block all emai
We get a lot of spam from a marketing company that uses hundreds of ip
addresses and hundreds of domain names but it always comes from
"support" at which ever names they are using that day.
My supervisor wants me to block all email coming from "supp...@*".
I have concerns about blocking legitimat
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 11:04 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> Clunk Werclick wrote:
> > I think perhaps 4-12 queries per message is not optimal?
> > If server handle 50,000 a day X 12 that is quite a lot? I don't think
> > it is going to get may fields returned for .co.uk .uk in my database?
> >
>
> Pos
On July 21, 2009 06:49:09 pm Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Ray wrote:
> > I have a solution, and It seems to work, just want to know if I'm going
> > to shoot myself in the foot.
> >
> > I'm running postfix 2.6 with a number of virtual domains, all data stored
> > in a MySql database.
Clunk Werclick wrote:
I think perhaps 4-12 queries per message is not optimal?
If server handle 50,000 a day X 12 that is quite a lot? I don't think
it is going to get may fields returned for .co.uk .uk in my database?
Postfix does the lookups required to route your mail properly.
I stress m
uses dkimproxy 1.1
work fine in my box
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:35:12 -0500, Noel Jones
wrote:
> Zakir Shaikh wrote:
>> Now, my problem is that when I send mails using webmail from the local
>> user configured through vPostmaster then the mails are getting signed
>> BUT the issue is that when the
Benny Pedersen wrote:
i like to have postfix strip these chars in headers so amavisd does not block
the mails with bad header, well maybe it kill dkim :/
but is there better options ?
reject and let senders solve it ?
The better option is to configure amavisd-new to accept bad
headers. I'
Zakir Shaikh wrote:
Now, my problem is that when I send mails using webmail from the local
user configured through vPostmaster then the mails are getting signed
BUT the issue is that when the mails sent from different machines using
their applicaitons then the messages are delivered but Not sig
LuKreme wrote:
On 21-Jul-2009, at 16:43, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
On Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:16 AM +0200 Patrick Ben Koetter
wrote:
These days OpenSSL is able to determine which random source it wants to
use. This might explain why it is empty in a Postfix install on Mac
OS X,
since it
Guy wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> 2009/7/22 Brian Evans - Postfix List :
>
>>> Could someone also tell me whether virtual_transport_maps are
>>> completely ignored if I have transport_maps set or whether
>>> transport_maps overrides virtual_transport_maps only if it gets a
>>> match?
>>>
>>>
>>
Hi Brian,
2009/7/22 Brian Evans - Postfix List :
> Guy wrote:
> Messages from sendmail(1) command enter via pickup.
> A good flow diagram can be seen here:
> http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html#overview
> There is generally no verification of addresses using this method.
Thanks.
Guy wrote:
> Is there any documentation that describes the mail flow for different
> messages (real address at local domain, non-existant address at local
> domain and remote address) when using /usr/sbin/sendmail to send them?
> I'd like to know what parts of Postfix it actually uses and which
> p
On 21-Jul-2009, at 16:43, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
On Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:16 AM +0200 Patrick Ben Koetter > wrote:
These days OpenSSL is able to determine which random source it
wants to
use. This might explain why it is empty in a Postfix install on Mac
OS X,
since it isn't require
On Wed, July 22, 2009 11:54, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Michael Monnerie :
>
>> Oh, nice. Only problem is, I'd need to deliver to an external program.
>> Or did you mean "local" from the postfix POV, and that external delivery
>> is possible from dovecot, and that dovecot has sieve? (Sorry, don't
I'm setting up a Postfix Mail Server. Applications from different nodes will be
sending their mails from this mail server using the mail clients in the
application.
Here are the postfix details:
-
#:>postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
alias_ma
On Wed, July 22, 2009 11:17, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Michael Monnerie :
>> I'm wondering if anybody knows of a way to include sieve in postfix
>> instead of procmail?
> User dovecot deliver instead of procmail when doing local delivery.
> That's it.
sieve reject does a accept and bounce, its
i like to have postfix strip these chars in headers so amavisd does not block
the mails with bad header, well maybe it kill dkim :/
but is there better options ?
reject and let senders solve it ?
--
xpoint
* Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Mittwoch 22 Juli 2009 Stefan Förster wrote:
> > What excatly are you trying to do with Sieve filtering?
>
> Yes, zarafa-dagent delivers, but you can tell it where:
> See http://forums.zarafa.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=2759
> Example procmail:
> :0w
> *
On Mittwoch 22 Juli 2009 Stefan Förster wrote:
> ince you mentioned procmail, my buest guess is that your
> Postfix/Zarafa integration is similar to the wiki page at
>
> http://zarafa.com/wiki/index.php/MTA_integration
>
> This leaves me slightly puzzled, because I can't imagine where you'd
> want
Hi guys,
I sent a mail about problems I was having with "out of office"
messages the other day and I think I may have started to find how to
fix my configuration to deal with the messages properly.
Is there any documentation that describes the mail flow for different
messages (real address at loc
* Michael Monnerie wrote:
> I currently have postfix -> procmail -> zarafa, and would like to have
> postfix -> sieve -> zarafa. Is that possible via a milter maybe? The
> sieve implementation would need to be able to call an external program
> to deliver mail, but the rest is standard.
Since you
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 20:31 +1000, Barney Desmond wrote:
> 2009/7/22 Clunk Werclick :
> > What I am not understanding is this is my list:
> >
> > debug_peer_list,fast_flush_domains,mynetworks,permit_mx_backup_networks,qmqpd_authorized_clients,smtpd_access_maps
> >
> > I don't understand which 'tabl
2009/7/22 Clunk Werclick :
> What I am not understanding is this is my list:
>
> debug_peer_list,fast_flush_domains,mynetworks,permit_mx_backup_networks,qmqpd_authorized_clients,smtpd_access_maps
>
> I don't understand which 'table type' is in charge of virtual and relay.
> It is perhaps not very c
* Michael Monnerie :
> Oh, nice. Only problem is, I'd need to deliver to an external program.
> Or did you mean "local" from the postfix POV, and that external delivery
> is possible from dovecot, and that dovecot has sieve? (Sorry, don't know
> dovecot at all)
>
> So I guess it should be
pos
You might be interested in knowing about a Linux and Open Source based
email & collaboration product for companies.
Check -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synovel_CollabSuite
http://www.synovel.com/collab/
It has a web based administration panel for managing servers and users
along with desktop cli
On Mittwoch 22 Juli 2009 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > I'm wondering if anybody knows of a way to include sieve in postfix
> > instead of procmail?
>
> User dovecot deliver instead of procmail when doing local delivery.
> That's it.
Oh, nice. Only problem is, I'd need to deliver to an external progr
* Michael Monnerie :
> I'm wondering if anybody knows of a way to include sieve in postfix
> instead of procmail?
User dovecot deliver instead of procmail when doing local delivery.
That's it.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
I'm wondering if anybody knows of a way to include sieve in postfix
instead of procmail? Or are all the sieve implementations so tightly
integrated to the mailer that this is not possible?
I currently have postfix -> procmail -> zarafa, and would like to have
postfix -> sieve -> zarafa. Is that
On Wednesday, July 22, 2009 at 07:31 CEST,
Olivier Nicole wrote:
> In my Postfix configuration I have
>
> local_recipient_maps = unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps
> ldap:$config_directory/ldap_local_recipient
>
> What is the expected output of the ldap: part? Anything non empty
72 matches
Mail list logo
