Re: avoid aliasing

On 27-Aug-2009, at 00:16, Stefan Palme wrote: On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 18:12 -0600, LuKreme wrote: On 26-Aug-2009, at 03:14, Stefan Palme wrote: user+noduplicate: user+noduplicate user: user, otheru...@otherdomain.com Seems to me this would be an ideal use of procmail. Thanks for

Re: avoid aliasing

On 26-Aug-2009, at 03:14, Stefan Palme wrote: user+noduplicate: user+noduplicate user: user, otheru...@otherdomain.com Seems to me this would be an ideal use of procmail. /etc/procmailrc ARG=$1 :0 * TO_user { :0 * ! ARG { DROPPRIVS :0c !otheru...@otherdo

Re: Blocking mail "from me to me" (was: Country IP block list)

On 24-Aug-2009, at 08:28, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote: The one bit of spam I'd like to stop, and I seem to remember seeing talk of it at some point (but I've been unable to find it again) is the spam appears to be "from me to me." That is, the spammers who use my email address as the from addr

Re: Relaying mail through remote server?

On 23-Aug-2009, at 17:50, MySQL Student wrote: I have a user that travels frequently. We have been using pop-before-smtp, and that's worked well. He now has a Verizon Air card, and the IP changes faster than the popb4smtp db can keep up with, so I had to add an entire /24 to mynetworks so he woul

Re: RBLS and Hangup

On 18-Aug-2009, at 10:42, Noel Jones wrote: The STRESS_README was written before postfix supported 521 as a hangup action, so yes, it's reasonable to disconnect after any RBL hit during stress. I am somewhat hesitant to recommend using 521 as your "standard" RBL reject code since the RFCs

RBLS and Hangup

After reading (and implementing) http://www.postfix.org/STRESS_README.html#hangup I was wondering if there is any reason not to extend this behavior to 127.0.0.4-8 (the XBL)? Also, why would I want: 8 rbl_reply_maps = ${stress?hash:/etc/postfix/rbl_reply_maps} Is there a reason I would onl

Re: test

On 18-Aug-2009, at 07:42, Hilel New wrote: I can't submit to this list LIES! -- When cheese gets its picture taken, what does it say?

Re: 450 temp error when 550 perm error is possible

On 17-Aug-2009, at 03:25, Martijn de Munnik wrote: The 450 error triggers the spammer to retry sending the mail. In point of fact, if it is a spammer sending you the mail, a 450 error is often enough to dissuade them. This is the principle behind greylisting. However, if these are real m

Re: Log Stats

On 16-Aug-2009, at 08:25, Sahil Tandon wrote: % bzcat /var/log/maillog.*.bz2 | postfix-logwatch When I did that for 30 days of logs I got a very long pause (20 minutes or so) and then no output at all. I did do it with --detail 1, but detail 1 for the current log, or for un-piped un-compres

HELO/EHLO rejection rate

I looked at the various rejections for the last 31 days, and I noticed that my unknown/HELO is very very high and my RBL is very very low. 5xx Reject relay denied 0.08% 5xx Reject HELO/EHLO45.97% 5xx Reject DATA 0.01%

Re: Log Stats

On 26-Jun-2009, at 09:28, Jiří Hlinka wrote: beside pflogsumm there is postfix-logwatch and amavis-logwatch: http://www.mikecappella.com/logwatch/ Sorry for pulling a post out of the wayback machine, but how do people through multiple logs at posftix-logwatch when they are compressed? all m

Re: Postfix + Vda patch - problems with bounce

On 14-Aug-2009, at 18:21, Marcelo Terres wrote: I know that, and I'm looking for help there too. Please stop TOFU posting. -- Vernon: Now this is the thought that wakes me up in the middle of the night. That when I get older, thes

Re: Altermine is removing attachments

On 13-Aug-2009, at 10:44, Jesus Alejandro Cuevas Villegas wrote: Hello Everyone, I'm new to postfix/altermine and I have this problem: This is my environment: Solaris 10 postfix-2.5.0 altermime-0.3.8 Is altermime part of postfix? -- What the hell's goin' on in the engine room? Were there

Re: Reverse DNS requirement

On Aug 4, 2009, at 3:42, Thomas Gelf wrote: the person who did not correctly set up the network is to be blamed, if you have equipment acting as MTA it should be configured the right way, otherwise use a relay server SHOULD be blamed? Yes. But the blame will fall on the mail admin. "T

Re: Reverse DNS requirement

On 3-Aug-2009, at 15:57, Robert Schetterer wrote: yes i know many mailling services from big companies who missed the reverse dns, but its their problem, after all if they cant get out their mail it should finally bounce to someone responsable No, you're still not understanding. Say you have

Re: mynetworks

On 3-Aug-2009, at 16:03, AMP Admin wrote: OH! So when I do it w/o the -d it shows my current config?! I do see mynetworks is correct now w/o the -d!!! run postconf -n for your settings minus the default. This is generally all you care about. Also, read man postconf And lastly, don't top

Re: lost my Delivered-To: header

On 3-Aug-2009, at 07:46, Tim Coote wrote: For historical reasons, I was using the Delivered-To: header as part of an IMAP Sieve rule. However, I seem to have lost this header in my inbound mail. from the headers I got of your mail: Return-Path: X-Original-To: krem...@kreme.com Delivered-To:

Re: put mails in hold queue based on size

On 1-Aug-2009, at 21:29, Sahil Tandon wrote: On Sat, 01 Aug 2009, LuKreme wrote: On 1-Aug-2009, at 06:18, ram wrote: Some users on my postfix system send *Huge* mails and I dont want the mails to be transferred during peak hours Why transfer them at all? Email is a horrible way to send HUGE

Re: put mails in hold queue based on size

On 1-Aug-2009, at 06:18, ram wrote: Some users on my postfix system send *Huge* mails and I dont want the mails to be transferred during peak hours Why transfer them at all? Email is a horrible way to send HUGE files. And grossly inefficient. And rude. Is there a way I can put mail to hold

Re: What causes the "message file too big" error?

On Jul 30, 2009, at 3:57 PM, Joe wrote: Seth Mattinen wrote: LuKreme wrote: On Jul 30, 2009, at 12:42 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: The exact byte count of the message+headers is 100793284 Seriously? 96MB emails? I hope that's internal only. Nope, not internal. Why does that matter? Pro

Re: not receiving forwarded mail from postfix, all logs seem fine

On Jul 30, 2009, at 2:44 PM, dvodvo wrote: Jul 30 00:59:42 mydomain postfix/trivial-rewrite[13937]: warning: do not list domain mydomain.ca in BOTH mydestination and virtual_alias_domains Fix this Jul 30 00:59:44 mydomain postfix/smtp[13941]: 7D04B96117E4: to=, orig_to=, relay=gmail-smtp-i

Re: What causes the "message file too big" error?

On Jul 30, 2009, at 12:42 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: The exact byte count of the message+headers is 100793284 Seriously? 96MB emails? I hope that's internal only. -- Procrastination is the art of keeping up with yesterday.

Re: Catchall account and lots of spam in a short period

On Jul 28, 2009, at 3:39 PM, mouss wrote: reported this to my boss, just to hear him saying "I don't want extensions. I want _real_ addresses". I used to have an email address (since retired into a spam magnet). u...@example.com -> All mail was fed to sa-learn --spam and reported to spamcop

Re: Catchall account and lots of spam in a short period

On Jul 28, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: Some large banks use first_l...@foo.com. What other sites use doesn't affect me. '-' is problematic because it is sometimes part of a person's actual name. I chose '_' over '.' because I had users who already used '.' as a first.last separat

Re: Catchall account and lots of spam in a short period

On Jul 27, 2009, at 11:56 AM, Martijn de Munnik wrote: I guess I need prohibit the catch all account and offer the solution with the delimiter instead. That way all spam to bogus email addresses get rejected because the address does not exist. That is the best course, yes. But still I wonde

Re: Catchall account and lots of spam in a short period

On Jul 27, 2009, at 11:18 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: To name one, I tried to get automobile insurance with GEICO, a large insurer in the USA. If I had access to my old virtual_alias_maps I could find many more who rejected the "+". AT&T, Coca Cola, nearly every bank or any site for a company that is

Re: spoofed mails from backup mail server

On Jul 28, 2009, at 4:54 AM, itsramesh_s wrote: I have configured backup mail server for our primary mail server. Almost certainly a mistake. i am getting lot of spam with spoofed email ids from our domain. That's one reason why. i noticed in header all these are accepting from backup m

Re: Fax Gateway Usage with Hylafax

On Jul 26, 2009, at 11:58 AM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: I suppose if I was using a consistent naming scheme for the temp files, or placed them in a subdirectory, I could use an hourly cron job to make sure they were cleaned up. That approach has always bothered me - but I don't know of a bett

Re: self signed ssl certs

On Jul 22, 2009, at 16:51, "Benny Pedersen" wrote: yes this is clear to me its is so, but i dont know why self signed ssl is being used so much when there is plenty of good trusted signers :/ Because a selfsigned cert is good enough and FREE.

Re: tls_random_source and OSX

On 21-Jul-2009, at 16:43, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: On Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:16 AM +0200 Patrick Ben Koetter > wrote: These days OpenSSL is able to determine which random source it wants to use. This might explain why it is empty in a Postfix install on Mac OS X, since it isn't require

Re: Postfix "Toaster" - replacing vpopmail

On 20-Jul-2009, at 04:57, Charles Marcus wrote: Now, if Apple would make an iPhone with a G1 style hardware keyboard, I'd even buy one... ;) Before I bought my iTouch last year I thought I was going to hate the touch-screen keyboard, but the auto correction and the editing is so easy that

Re: Getting a lot of these

On 19-Jul-2009, at 07:35, Wietse Venema wrote: LuKreme: Weitse: LuKreme: Getting a lot of these: postfix/trivial-rewrite[88525]: fatal: proxy:mysql:/usr/local/etc/ postfix/mysql_virtual_domains_maps.cf(0,lock|fold_fix): table lookup problem Log for trivial-rewrite warning: records in

Re: Getting a lot of these

On 18-Jul-2009, at 22:43, LuKreme wrote: Weitse: LuKreme: > Getting a lot of these: OK, never mind. After digging through the thousands of log lines I found the first sql error. Evidently at some point in updating postfixadmin the password to the 'postfix' mysql database w

Re: Getting a lot of these

Weitse: LuKreme: > Getting a lot of these: > > postfix/trivial-rewrite[88525]: fatal: proxy:mysql:/usr/local/etc/ > postfix/mysql_virtual_domains_maps.cf(0,lock|fold_fix): table lookup > problem Log for trivial-rewrite warning: records in Postfix logs. Look in the MySQL logs.

problem talking to service rewrite (mysql?)

Getting a lot of these: postfix/trivial-rewrite[88525]: fatal: proxy:mysql:/usr/local/etc/ postfix/mysql_virtual_domains_maps.cf(0,lock|fold_fix): table lookup problem postfix/smtpd[27380]: warning: problem talking to service rewrite: Unknown error: 0 postfix/smtpd[27362]: warning: problem t

Re: Multiple PTR entries

On 16-Jul-2009, at 10:32, Roderick A. Anderson wrote: help with them configuring their MTA (probably Exchange) so it plays well with the rest of the world. Exchange? Rest of the world? Play well? *cough* -- ...but the senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explai

Re: postscreen test

On 17-Jul-2009, at 09:29, Michel Lavondes wrote: On Thu, July 16, 2009 7:23 pm, Mike Cappella wrote: On 7/13/09 5:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: I'm still open for program name suggestions. If someone has a better name than "swatter" or "halligan" let me know. Once the name changes, all the co

Re: postscreen test

On 16-Jul-2009, at 12:24, Charles Marcus wrote: On 7/16/2009 11:56 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote: I'm still open for program name suggestions. If someone has a better name than "swatter" or "halligan" let me know. Once the name changes, all the configuration parameters will change, too. "pref

Re: temporary errors for DNS

On 13-Jul-2009, at 16:24, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: Is there a way to disambiguate between DNS timeouts and DNS errors, and discard the latter? Why the devil would you want to discard mail based on a DNS error? DNS errors have a habit of being quite transient. -- Lithium will no longer be

Re: Errors after upgrades

On 12-Jul-2009, at 16:32, LuKreme wrote: On Jul 12, 2009, at 8:41 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote: Sounds like a MySQL (not Postfix) issue; debug there. Are there any other type of mysql error lines in the log? Nope, and the errors are rare. OTOH, I use MySQL almost exclusively for postfix

Re: Errors after upgrades

On Jul 12, 2009, at 8:41 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote: Sounds like a MySQL (not Postfix) issue; debug there. Are there any other type of mysql error lines in the log? Nope, and the errors are rare. OTOH, I use MySQL almost exclusively for postfix.

Errors after upgrades

I updated my ports of mysql to 5.1.35 and of postfix to 2.6.2. Everything seems to be working fine, except I get these errors occasionally: postfix/trivial-rewrite[65905]: fatal: proxy:mysql:/usr/local/etc/ postfix/mysql_virtual_domains_maps.cf(0,lock|fold_fix): table lookup problem if I

Re: Recommended way to (quickly) get total mail queue size?

On Jul 7, 2009, at 9:15 AM, Michael Durket wrote: So what's the best way to quickly (i.e. less than a few seconds) get the current queue count out of Postfix? ls -1 [queue directory] | wc -l ?

Re: Some early postscreen results

On 7-Jul-2009, at 09:23, Wietse Venema wrote: You can find an overview of postscreen, and some pictures of early results, at http://www.porcupine.org/postfix-mirror/wip.html (and soon on Postfix documentation mirror websites). I've gone through the slides and the "Prototype postscreen archite

Re: backscatter

On 4-Jul-2009, at 20:53, John Peach wrote: http://www.backscatterer.org/?target=usage well worth looking at Yeah, I added that a few months ago. -- How you have felt, o men of Athens, at hearing the speeches of m accusers, I cannot tell; but I know that their persuasive words

Re: No 220 to some addresses

On 4-Jul-2009, at 13:10, Jeff Stampes wrote: $ telnet tigger.net 25 Trying 198.59.16.20... Connected to tigger.net. Escape character is '^]'. Connection closed by foreign host. I'd guess that your inlaws's ISP is blocking access out on port 25. -- Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pay

Re: backscatter

On 3-Jul-2009, at 20:35, Andrew Thompson wrote: what is the hate for backscatter founded in? Wait until you get hundreds of thousands of backscatter where someone has sent out spams with your user name as the From: address and helpful mail systems bounce them 'back' to you since your addre

Re: Adding a header

On 30-Jun-2009, at 06:11, Ole Tange wrote: I have emails with subject: Subject: blah blah [Our Ref:XXX9] I would like to have that changed to: X-Our-Ref: XXX9 Subject: blah blah Run it through procmail, it's trivial. -- Naked blonde walks into a bar with a poodle under one arm, and

greylist and then still RBL?

I have the following in my main.cf: <(there are no leading spaces or stray ,'s, I pasted the lines exactly in, including the following blank line.) but when I look at postconf, the "check_greylist =" does not show up. $ postconf -n | grep grey smtpd_restriction_classes = check_greylist $ Is

Re: Tip: Restricting mail reception using a remote service's SPF records

On 25-Jun-2009, at 14:33, Ville Walveranta wrote: It works except that the Postfix refresh message ("postfix/postfix-script: refreshing the Postfix mail system") is displayed despite of the attempt to redirect it to /dev/null? Any idea how I could hide it? That refresh message is output on std

Re: rejecting client=unknown[ip.ad.dr.ess]

On 23-Jun-2009, at 06:31, Jan P. Kessler wrote: Another option is to use selective greylisting on "unknown" clients: MAIN.CF smtpd_recipient:_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, <...others...>, check_client_access = pcre:/etc/postfix/client_check /etc/postfix/client_check: /^unknown$/ check

Re: rejecting client=unknown[ip.ad.dr.ess]

On 22-Jun-2009, at 18:29, mouss wrote: Is there anyway to, if not outright reject anyone whose DNS shows up as unknown to at least tempfail them with a "Ooops, your DNS is not resolving, try back later" or something? if you insist, you could use one of http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html

rejecting client=unknown[ip.ad.dr.ess]

Received a message with the following received header: Received: from twitter.com (unknown [152.157.207.191]) by mail.covisp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D796118B753 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:46:37 -0600 (MDT) It was a virus payload containing a zip file with a .exe inside it

Re: Multiple relay_hosts

On 20 Jun, 2009, at 09:17 , Cory Hawkless wrote: Hi, thanks for the reply(And prompt!) But i'm confused as to what you mean about hijacking threads? Instead of starting your own thread, you replied to Fakessh's message with the subject 'sid-milter with postfix' then you changed the subjec

Re: Header Filter Time Range

On 15-Jun-2009, at 02:52, EASY steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk wrote: Look at it like this, if you go to the supermarket when it is closed for business you don't expect to be able to get in :-) Supermarkets close? But what about mailing lists? I sent my message at 0200 or so this morning

Re: Header Filter Time Range

On 15-Jun-2009, at 01:09, EASY steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk wrote: Probably a stupid question, but in practical terms is it possible to set a header filter that will reject (or ideally defer) mail on time range? For example during the hours of 00:00 -> 07:00. Erm.. well, yes, you COULD

Re: Confirmation email with captcha

On 10-Jun-2009, at 01:24, Gabriel Hahmann wrote: I'm looking for a tool that can handle confirmation emails with captcha and that works with postfix. The idea is, when somebody sends me an email and this address have never sent me any other mail, automatically the sender receives a message with

Re: Should I upgrade from 2.3.X?

On 10-Jun-2009, at 03:52, Michael Wang wrote: I've been running my current email system using Postfix 2.3.X since the end of 2006. It's a very small system since it's just my personal email on various domains I own. However I'm loathe to mess with it since it has been running rock solid and

Re: virtual.regexp not working

On 3-Jun-2009, at 20:51, LuKreme wrote: /j10(300|2\d\d)@example\.com$/ thisaddr...@example.com Oops. /j10(300|[0-2]\d\d)@example\.com$/ thisaddr...@example.com -- And I just don't care what happens next / looks like freedom but it feels like death / it's something in

Re: virtual.regexp not working

On 3-Jun-2009, at 00:28, Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL wrote: /j(10001..10300)\...@domain\.com/ thisaddr...@domain.com /j10(300|2\d\d)@example\.com$/ thisaddr...@example.com -- Q how do you titillate an ocelot? A you oscillate its tit a lot.

Re: Brasil is adopting submission protocol

To be fair, their whole world is upside-down down there, so their top posting is really bottom posting! On 1-Jun-2009, at 09:43, Noel Jones wrote: Sadly, no. -- Noel Jones Gerard wrote: On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:39:31 -0300 (UYT) Miguel Da Silva - CMat wrote: Good news. [snip] Is there any

Re: Vacation messages

On 1-Jun-2009, at 02:18, Webmaster Bliss Corporation wrote: I need to configure my system to send vacation messages on a per- user basis. My system is configured as follows: this is not a postfix-related issue. -- Can I tell you the truth? I mean this isn't like TV news, i

Re: 550 No such user here

On 28-May-2009, at 15:24, mouss wrote: admin2 a écrit : Hi there, Okay the top 5 google hits could not answer this. how do I place a bounce mail message in the /etc/postfix/virtual file? Similar to a sendmail virtuser file? postmas...@domain.org error:nouser 550 No such user here y

Re: Brasil is adopting submission protocol

On 30-May-2009, at 04:37, Gerard wrote: On Sat, 30 May 2009 02:39:47 -0300 Julio Cesar Covolato wrote: I'm proud to inform you that Brasil is adopting the submission protocol !! Its very good to ereryone! Sorry, but I am slightly confused. Are you implying that the Country of Brazil, aka

Re: mails staying in mailq

On 31-May-2009, at 13:21, Javier wrote: Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 13:21:38 +1930 I think that Date header is invalid, btw -- Try to realize it's all within yourself/No one else can make you change

Re: "nobody is going to write a new MTA"

On 28 May 2009, at 03:56, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: Turns out Wietse was wrong: http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/334866/fffe7b1a0716c0e4/ Would it be approriate to ask what the issues are with postfix's license? I hate to admit it, but I've never read it.

Re: log query

On 27-May-2009, at 05:29, Sahil Tandon wrote: On Tue, 26 May 2009, LuKreme wrote: On 26-May-2009, at 17:39, Lists wrote: As part of my mail system I am using postgrey. When stuff is stopped at the gate (so to speek) i.e. it doesn't even get into the the system is there a log kept of

Re: log query

On 26-May-2009, at 17:39, Lists wrote: As part of my mail system I am using postgrey. When stuff is stopped at the gate (so to speek) i.e. it doesn't even get into the the system is there a log kept of this? postgrey logs to the maillog. lines look like this: May 26 16:27:18 mail postgrey[9

Re: Temporary return code on address lookup error

On 26-May-2009, at 02:51, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: But I think we're wandering away from the original question anyhow? And if it is wrong that Postfix responds with "user unknown" when the directory is unavailable, what SHOULD it be? "Don't know"? You keep saying that it is Postfix that is r

Re: helo restrictions

On 24-May-2009, at 15:02, mouss wrote: LuKreme a écrit : May 23 14:48:17 mail postfix/smtpd[30899]: NOQUEUE: warn: RCPT from 201-88-100-143.gnace704.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br[201.88.100.143]: Dynamic DSL looking address; from= to= proto=ESMTP helo= note that the IP is listed in zen (PBL and

Re: helo restrictions

On 24-May-2009, at 15:05, Sahil Tandon wrote: Hm, that "warn" does not correspond to what you purportedly have in your smtpd_recipient_restrictions; it should have been an outright rejection. I'd just changed the WARN to REJECT today and the log entry was from yesterday. It was while doub

helo restrictions

I have the following: main.cf in smtpd_recipient_restrictions: check_helo_access pcre:$config_directory/helo_checks.pcre, in helo_checks.pcre: /(lan|home|example|local)$/ REJECT Mailserver name in private namespace but in logs: May 23 14:48:17 mail postfix/smtpd[30899]: NOQ

spoofed addresses

I, like everyone I'm sure, have seen a large uptick in spam attempts to Message-Ids as if they were email addresses. Of course they are all rejected as unknown users, but is it worth putting in a rule to catch these specifically? -- Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges.

Re: Sent Mail Shows FQDN in Email Address

On 18-May-2009, at 21:47, Scott Haneda wrote: Glad you brought this up, often times I am using example.com and then ns.example.com and imap.example.com and want to refer to something else outside of example.com. At least example.net and example.org in addition to example.com, so you can e

Re: Sent Mail Shows FQDN in Email Address

On 17-May-2009, at 19:44, Carlos Williams wrote: u...@mail.myserver.com myserver.com is a real domain name. Is it YOUR domain name? Somehow I doubt it. Use example.com, example.net, example.org, etc. Or use an impossible name like mydomain.tld, foobar.tld, &c. when obfuscating. Oh, and

Re: Not able to add disclaimer

On 18-May-2009, at 03:24, bijayant kumar wrote: I am trying to add disclaimer on the local mail server for the outgoing emails. Oh god no, don't. Please, please don't. And as a point of reference, anytime I get an email with a 'confidential' or 'copyright' disclaimer, I put it on my webser

Re: Question about postfix log system

On 18-May-2009, at 04:49, Wietse Venema wrote: Giovanni Mancuso: Hi to all, i have a question about postfix logging system. The normal logging system, print in a log file the message-id of email: May 18 04:02:14 fe postfix/cleanup[28007]: 4507B1E8621: message-id=<20090518020214.4507b1e8...@

Re: Header Check Assistance

On 15-May-2009, at 12:58, mouss wrote: Drew Tomlinson a écrit : [snip] OK, I think I understand now. uribl is a way to check mail content for domains that *appear* in spam, not from where the mail is sent. Good idea! I will see about adding that to SpamAssassin. yes. and also consider

Re: Need To Reject Inbound From Addresses with My Own Domain/s

On 15-May-2009, at 09:37, Noel Jones wrote: (The situation is confused by some linux vendors that include an enhanced regexp library with some of the pcre features. So \d may work on SOME regexp libraries, but it certainly isn't widely portable regexp syntax, and Viktor was right to point o

Re: kill ip from bootnets and zombi (shell script)

On 15-May-2009, at 04:18, Wietse Venema wrote: LuKreme: On 14-May-2009, at 17:29, mouss wrote: LuKreme a _crit : I think I have it all sussed out, except there doesn_t seem to be an init script installed under FreeBSD. because fail2ban works on freebsd? I meant a script to start

Re: kill ip from bootnets and zombi (shell script)

On May 15, 2009, at 1:24, Corey Chandler wrote: LuKreme wrote: On 14-May-2009, at 17:29, mouss wrote: LuKreme a écrit : I think I have it all sussed out, except there doesn’t seem to be an init script installed under FreeBSD. because fail2ban works on freebsd? I meant a script to

Re: kill ip from bootnets and zombi (shell script)

On 14-May-2009, at 17:29, mouss wrote: LuKreme a écrit : I think I have it all sussed out, except there doesn’t seem to be an init script installed under FreeBSD. because fail2ban works on freebsd? I meant a script to start fail2ban, like in rc.d (init.d in Linux). Am I the only person

Re: Need To Reject Inbound From Addresses with My Own Domain/s

On 14-May-2009, at 20:19, Noel Jones wrote: You're right, that's a pcre construct and not universally supported by regexp. A more portable expression would be: /operator#[0-...@somephishingbanksite\.com$/ REJECT phishing Now, just to double check, if postfix is compiled with PCRE then it

Re: kill ip from bootnets and zombi (shell script)

On 14-May-2009, at 01:39, Bill Landry wrote: Have you taken a look at fail2ban?: http://www.fail2ban.org It already does this using python, run in daemon mode, and can support any application that writes to a log file. Looking at that now. Looks neat, but I wish there was a HOWTO readme

Re: SPF

On 11-May-2009, at 09:41, Mathias Meinelt wrote: Simon Wilson wrote: TXT v=spf1 a mx ip4:59.167.212.191 ~all Is my TXT record OK? Do I need the IP4 entry? [115 total lines deleted] Mathias Was it really necessary to quote all of the previous message? Yes, top posting is evil and wro

Re: cannot connect to mysql. Too many conections.

On 8-May-2009, at 10:31, Wietse Venema wrote: Short reply: s/mysql/proxy:mysql/ Is there any reason to *NOT* do this? I mean, should you use proxy: every time you use a mysql lookup? -- Si Hoc Legere Scis Nimium Eruditionis Habes

Re: Escaping '^From ' in the body

On 8-May-2009, at 04:02, mouss wrote: LuKreme a écrit : On 7-May-2009, at 16:01, mouss wrote: procmail isn't part of postfix. so test without procmail. If I send a message to a non-procmail enabled account, it delivers to a mbox file in $HOME/Maildir/ with a name like msg.Dv4Z.

Re: Escaping '^From ' in the body

On 7-May-2009, at 16:01, mouss wrote: procmail isn't part of postfix. so test without procmail. If I send a message to a non-procmail enabled account, it delivers to a mbox file in $HOME/Maildir/ with a name like msg.Dv4Z. On 7-May-2009, at 16:07, Noel Jones wrote: LuKreme wrote:

Re: Escaping '^From ' in the body

On May 7, 2009, at 12:18, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote: LuKreme: On 7-May-2009, at 08:29, Wietse Venema wrote: LuKreme: I changed all my delivery mailboxes over to Maildir with procmail as the LDA, but I am still seeing lines that begin with 'From ' being rewritten

Re: Escaping '^From ' in the body

On 7-May-2009, at 08:29, Wietse Venema wrote: LuKreme: I changed all my delivery mailboxes over to Maildir with procmail as the LDA, but I am still seeing lines that begin with 'From ' being rewritten to '>From ' You need to verify that the > is added by Postfix, n

Re: Recommendation For Postfix Mailboxes

On May 7, 2009, at 8:38, Carlos Williams wrote: Thanks all. I think with less than 300 users & security not being a huge deal since I set everyone's shell to /sbin/nologin. The main reason I setup almost all my users as virtual is to allow them to configure aliases and change their own passw

Re: Escaping '^From ' in the body

oops.. sent before compelte: On 7-May-2009, at 07:53, LuKreme wrote: (doing a grep on a virtual user I got a result of: cur/ 1228061198 .M123110P48822V0054I00769D49_41.mail.covisp.net,S=2584:2,RS:From predictions to (no escaping) searching the list mail I find: cur

Escaping '^From ' in the body

I changed all my delivery mailboxes over to Maildir with procmail as the LDA, but I am still seeing lines that begin with 'From ' being rewritten to '>From ' My list account is a local account and procmail is invoked via the mailbox_command: mailbox_command = /usr/local/bin/procmail -t -a

Re: Postfix Setup

On 6-May-2009, at 01:29, Rik wrote: I could not agree more. To the point this is the very *LAST* place I go for help. This should be the last place you go for help. You read the docs, you google, you research, try and find the answer, and THEN you post here. I can't tell you how often I'

Re: Postfix Setup

On 5-May-2009, at 10:04, Jeff Bernier wrote: There's really no need to berate me and otherwise treat me like a buffoon Victor. Is there someone willing to help? Please? Consider two things. First, stop top-posting. Trim your quoted material and reply after, preserving the conversatio

Re: Generate temporary error for ldap relay_recipient_maps for network outages

On 4-May-2009, at 14:17, Harakiri wrote: --- On Mon, 5/4/09, Victor Duchovni wrote: From: Victor Duchovni Subject: Re: Generate temporary error for ldap relay_recipient_maps for network outages To: postfix-users@postfix.org Date: Monday, May 4, 2009, 2:38 PM On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:24:2

Re: Postfix doesn't create maildirs

On 2-May-2009, at 14:05, Matthias Dietrich wrote: I use Postfix with virtual mailboxes for virtual domain hosting. Authentication is done with mysql, creating of new mailboxes is done via postfixadmin. I add a new Domain (example.com) and Mailbox (postmaster). Trying to log in after that

Re: Sizing Linux Partitions for use with Postfix

On 30-Apr-2009, at 09:58, Jon wrote: I want to create a new debian Linux based postfix system to sit in front of Exchange 2003 and act only as an SMTP gateway for starters and possibly do some filtering down the road. There seems to be less than 65,000 connections per day coming at Exchange

Re: Strange Bounce

On 24-Apr-2009, at 08:57, N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote: Charles Marcus wrote (on Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 05:51:51AM -0400): On 4/24/2009, Vince Sabio (vi...@vjs.org) wrote: I'd rather not post information like that _pro forma_; if there's some subset of that information that might be of help in diagnos

Re: postfix for LAN -> remote mail server

On 18-Apr-2009, at 00:01, Barney Desmond wrote: 2009/4/18 LuKreme : Well, that's not quite it. The issue is not simply that I don't want SMTP connections out of this LAN to servers other than the mail.example.com server (that is dealt with with relayhost, iirc) Firewall poli

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >