at 1:18 PM Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 07:58:45PM +, Travis Dolan wrote:
>
> > content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
>
> There's your problem. Your content filter is too slow, it is
> probably doing remote DNS lookups.
>
> The m
= permit_mynetworks,reject
127.0.0.1:10025/inet/smtpd_restriction_classes =
127.0.0.1:10025/inet/smtpd_sender_restrictions =
127.0.0.1:10025/inet/smtpd_soft_error_limit = 1001
Thanks in advance.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:25 PM Wietse Venema wrote:
> Travis Dolan:
> > Requested co
16, 2016, at 2:13 PM, Travis Dolan
> wrote:
> >
> > I am working from the following data
> >
> > qshape deferred = TOTAL 10
> > qshape -s deferred = TOTAL 9
> >
> > qshape active = TOTAL 2819
> > qshape -s active = TOTAL 1469
> >
> >
.
You mentioned clocks, that could be a potential issue. The sending server
in this case is UTC, and the receiving server is PST. How would this
manifest itself?
Thanks in advance.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:56 AM Wietse Venema wrote:
> Travis Dolan:
> > That is the issue, the receivi
ustom smtp
transport open, and messages fly off my server. The bottle neck does not
seem to be on the receiver, it seems to be the active queue on the sending
host.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:44 AM Travis Dolan
wrote:
> Unfortunately there are many MTAs/MUAs that send to my host, which then
> sen
smtp transport destination.
There must be a way to requeue messages in my active queue faster.
Thanks in advance.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:14 AM Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wietse Venema:
> > Travis Dolan:
> > > The destination server has no issue with the amount of mes
I have 1000's of messages in my active queue destined for a single host.
This is noticeably slowing down the delivery of messages to other
destinations/users.
I have created a custom smtp transport for the host responsible for all the
messages in my queue. I have then tweaked the following for the
I think the answer is "no" but just wanted to double-check
--
Obama Nation | It's not like I'm encrypting... it's more like I've
developed a massive entropy deficiency |
http://www.subsubpacefield.org/~travis/
If you are a spammer, please email j...@subspacefield.org to get blacklisted.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 08:30:47PM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Travis wrote:
>
> > I recently started bouncing email because (it appears) I had a mixture
> > of space-indentation and tab-indentation on the multi-line $mydestinations
> > line.
>
&g
like this...
--
http://www.subspacefield.org/~travis/
The United States is an Obama Nation.
If you are a spammer, please email j...@subspacefield.org to get blacklisted.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 03:36:01PM +0400, Nikita Kipriyanov wrote:
> Travis wrote:
> There are wrong permissions on saslauthd socket. From
> http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html :
>
> IMPORTANT: saslauthd usually establishes a UNIX domain socket in
> /var/run/sasla
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 03:43:09PM -0500, Travis wrote:
> Closer... now Thunderbird prompts for my password over and over, but I've
> set it properly.
What's the meaning of:
Oct 10 22:40:55 lexus postfix/smtpd[13983]: warning: SASL authentication
failure: cannot connect to
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:32:50PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> Travis wrote:
> >[snip]
> >-- basics --
> >Postfix: 2.3.8
> >System: Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 \n \l
> >[snip]
> >
> >-- listing of /usr/lib/sasl2 --
> >total 116
> >drwxr-xr-x 2 root r
n/postfix-to-mailman.py
${nexthop} ${user}
-- mechanisms on localhost --
-- end of saslfinger output --
--
Crypto ergo sum. http://www.subspacefield.org/~travis/
Truth does not fear scrutiny or competition, only lies do.
If you are a spammer, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get blacklisted.
n_local_recipient_reject_code = 550
virtual_alias_domains = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual_alias_domains
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual_alias_maps
--
Crypto ergo sum. http://www.subspacefield.org/~travis/
Truth does not fear scrutiny or competition, only lies do.
If you are a spammer, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get blacklisted.
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 08:15:24AM +0200, mouss wrote:
> Travis wrote:
> >I also notice that even though the SSL keys have passwords on them,
> >postfix never prompts for them.
> >
>
> daemons do not prompt.
Perhaps they should not, but apache does. Dovecot has a
c/postfix/virtual_alias_domains
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual_alias_maps
--
Crypto ergo sum. http://www.subspacefield.org/~travis/
Truth does not fear scrutiny or competition, only lies do.
If you are a spammer, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get blacklisted.
17 matches
Mail list logo
