On Wed, July 22, 2009 18:31, Robert Lopez wrote:
> Which postfix list would be best used for such a block? Could it be
> sender_access?
http://www.google.dk/search?q=sender_localpart+postfwd&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=com.ubuntu:da-DK:unofficial&client=firefox-a
--
xpoint
* Robert Lopez :
> We get a lot of spam from a marketing company that uses hundreds of ip
> addresses and hundreds of domain names but it always comes from
> "support" at which ever names they are using that day.
How do you know it's from the same company?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich
Robert Lopez wrote:
> We get a lot of spam from a marketing company that uses hundreds of ip
> addresses and hundreds of domain names but it always comes from
> "support" at which ever names they are using that day.
>
> My supervisor wants me to block all email coming from "supp...@*".
>
> I have c
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 10:31 -0600, Robert Lopez wrote:
> We get a lot of spam from a marketing company that uses hundreds of ip
> addresses and hundreds of domain names but it always comes from
> "support" at which ever names they are using that day.
>
> My supervisor wants me to block all email c
hould have severe concerns in case you implement that kind of block,
yes. Unless you don't correspond with _any_ other company (or rather,
nobody ever sends you "unsolicited", but desired mail), I'd have severe
doubts that blocking supp...@* this generally helps you even the
We get a lot of spam from a marketing company that uses hundreds of ip
addresses and hundreds of domain names but it always comes from
"support" at which ever names they are using that day.
My supervisor wants me to block all email coming from "supp...@*".
I have concerns about blocking legitimat
