On 02/24/2014 10:21 PM, John Sowden wrote:
On 02/24/2014 06:59 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 02/24/2014 05:38 PM, Eurico Chagas Filho wrote:
Hi Eurico,
Yes, interesting . . .
Have those of us (including me) contributed to the viewing of the YT
based on his cyberpublicist? Note that cyberpubli
On 02/24/2014 06:59 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 02/24/2014 05:38 PM, Eurico Chagas Filho wrote:
Nice one stand comedy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3b0iSKbpmcY
E.
Hi Eurico,
Yes, interesting . . .
Have those of us (including me) contributed to the viewing of the YT
based on his cyberpubl
On 02/24/2014 05:38 PM, Eurico Chagas Filho wrote:
Nice one stand comedy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3b0iSKbpmcY
E.
Hi Eurico,
Yes, interesting . . .
--
Regards,
Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/
https://www.facebook.com/pete.theisen.5
__
Hey Ed - I agree with U! I just recently got involved w/3D Printer meet ups &'I
enjoy it!
-K-
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 24, 2014, at 4:44 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
>
>> On Feb 24, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
>>
>> Would never have thought to use meetup because that is so old and o
Nice one stand comedy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3b0iSKbpmcY
E.
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenan
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Stephen Russell
> wrote:
>
> > Would never have thought to use meetup because that is so old and
> outdated.
> > It never really got any functionality here in Memphis. Probably because
> > not enough people gave a f
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014, at 06:00 PM, Wes Wilson wrote:
>
>
> 1. I know that Fox 2.6 and earlier will not run on Windows 7 and 8.
They will quite happily run on 32-bit Windows 7 and 8. It's the 64-bit
versions of the OS that are the problem.
> 2. Are there any version of VFP that will not run?
On Feb 24, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> Would never have thought to use meetup because that is so old and outdated.
> It never really got any functionality here in Memphis. Probably because
> not enough people gave a flip to go out and do something?
Well, that certainly is one of
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
>
> http://blog.michaelckennedy.net/2014/02/21/ever-wonder-how-big-the-net-and-python-communities-are/
> ( -or- http://j.mp/Nse5Ec )
>
> Nothing shocking here.
>
> -
>
Would never have thought to use meetup because that is so old
http://blog.michaelckennedy.net/2014/02/21/ever-wonder-how-big-the-net-and-python-communities-are/
( -or- http://j.mp/Nse5Ec )
Nothing shocking here.
-- Ed Leafe
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/signed
text/plain (text body -- kept)
application/pgp-signature
---
Fox2.6 should run fine on Win7 as long as the OS is still 32 bit. Been
doing it that way a long time.
If your Win7 is 64 bit, you'll have to run a VM that's only 32 bit and run
Fox2.6 in that.
Fred
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Wes Wilson wrote:
> http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/wind
Download and reinstall the Conversion Pack again. Ran into a similar
problem with Office2003 and XP/SP3 and a redownload and reinstall fixed it.
Fred
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Ken Dibble wrote:
>
> I've used it successfully with Office 2003 and XP many times.
>>
>
> And I've tested it
Win 7 Pro "comes with" a license for Windows XP. At least I didn't have
to enter a license when I created the WinXP virtual computer on the Win
7 Pro boxes. You do have to go through some kind of "validation" process
with Windows 7 Pro to confirm that it is a valid license before you are
allowe
I've had some success running an old Clipper DOS app in DOSBox.
Might be worth looking into as it's more integrated into the OS and
won't require a XP license.
This wasn't in a production environment, I just needed to restore a
backup that used a proprietry format.
On 24 February 2014 18:26, Mike
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Kurt @ VR-FX wrote:
> And - Stephen - Your blatant and direct comments also Crack me Up - but, I
> don't disagree with you. For the folks here being techies - some of the
> feedback makes me chuckle. That being said - there are still some
> interesting and valid
And - Stephen - Your blatant and direct comments also Crack me Up - but,
I don't disagree with you. For the folks here being techies - some of
the feedback makes me chuckle. That being said - there are still some
interesting and valid points being brought up on both sides of the
equation...
-
I'm setting up all clients on Win 7 Pro and then installing the Windows
Virtual PC and Windows XP SP3 in that, with my FoxDos 2.6 running very
happily in the WinXP virtual computer. It even works on multi-core CPUs
(which regular WinXP on a multi-core CPU would not without some tweaking.)
Mike
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/end-support-help
Microsoft is ending all support for XP on April 14, 2014. There will be no
more security updates which is the biggest single immediate issue for current
users. There are some experts who believe that it will not be more than a few
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Ken Dibble wrote:
>
> Why not just catch the docs coming in and via one license convert them
>> back
>> to any flavor older version you want?
>>
>> Just write a service that polls a folder to see if anything is in there.
>> As you copy the documents to the "pro
I'm afraid I don't know - I just used downloaded FileFormatConverts.exe from
the M$ website and ran it, after that Word would open .docx files without
any problem but not save as docx.
Interesting. I can save .docx format in Office 97 on XP with the conversion
pack.
Thanks.
Ken
> -O
Compatibility pack works fine with all versions of Office from 2003 upwards on
XP and Windows 7.
You do need .Net 3.5 installed though.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ken Dibble
Sent: 24 February 2014 13:44
To: profox@leafe.com
Subje
Hi Ken,
I'm afraid I don't know - I just used downloaded FileFormatConverts.exe from
the M$ website and ran it, after that Word would open .docx files without
any problem but not save as docx.
John
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:pr
Why not just catch the docs coming in and via one license convert them back
to any flavor older version you want?
Just write a service that polls a folder to see if anything is in there.
As you copy the documents to the "processing zone" you identify the nasty
"X" versions and flip them in the
I've used it successfully with Office 2003 and XP many times.
And I've tested it in that environment (Office 2003, SP2 on XP SP3) and it
didn't work. Are there:
1. Different versions of the conversion pack, which are not readily
discernible from each other or easy to find?
2. Windows upd
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Ken Dibble wrote:
>
> > Meanwhile, one of our biggest contracts requires us to use a
>> state-developed
>>
> > web-based document management/workflow system that only works on IE, and
>> > only on IE versions 7, 8, and 9. Now I'm scrambling. I have to tell my
>>
>
I've used it successfully with Office 2003 and XP many times.
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://ma
> I am running ms Word/ ms Office 2003 - some time ago I downloaded a
> utility/update (?) from ms and I can read, edit and save .docx files. The
> originators of these documents have not had any problem with my updated
> versions.
Microsoft Office Compatibility Pack for Word, Excel, and P
It's called:
Microsoft Office Compatibility Pack for Word, Excel, and PowerPoint
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/products/microsoft-office-compatibility-pack-for-word-excel-and-powerpoint-FX103471202.aspx
Don't think OpenOffice/LibreOffice could make use it never attempted...
On Mon, Feb 2
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014, at 02:31 PM, Malcolm Greene wrote:
> Has anyone used Cyberduck?
I had a look at the Windows version at one point I think, but I couldn't
see why it was better than FileZilla for my admittedly light FTP
requirements.
___
Post Mes
29 matches
Mail list logo
