Great! That's what I was hoping you said...just wanted to make sure.
Thank you for clarifying the details.
Mike
Ken Dibble wrote:
Just to be clear, are you saying Win10 won't connect to a Samba 3
server?
Or is Win10-connectivity only a problem when a Samba 3 server is
providing AD services?
Just to be clear, are you saying Win10 won't connect to a Samba 3 server?
Or is Win10-connectivity only a problem when a Samba 3 server is
providing AD services?
I've got MANY Linux boxes providing simple share of data files... If
Win10 won't talk to them, that's huge for me.
Thanks for a
Ken,
Just to be clear, are you saying Win10 won't connect to a Samba 3 server?
Or is Win10-connectivity only a problem when a Samba 3 server is
providing AD services?
I've got MANY Linux boxes providing simple share of data files... If
Win10 won't talk to them, that's huge for me.
Thanks f
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Ken Dibble wrote:
>
> SAMBA 4 emulates Active Directory, though I don't know how well.
>
Looking around at samba.org, it seems like Samba 4.1 is specifcally
targeting Windows 10 AD.
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Installing_RSAT_on_Windows_for_AD_Management
and
>> What will you lose?
>
>
> The ability to interact with a SAMBA 3 Domain.
>
Well, that could be a problem. I've got legacy Linux servers deployed
at client sites with older Samba servers, working fine for years.
Looks like I'll have to look at upgrade options.
The Windows Update is free, bu
I'm testing this, and found that when you configure COM+ to use Soap (I've
using this article:
http://www.kehm.de/henrik/blog/files/a5019da836d29c3cee972f5f62b5a8bd-19.html),
then every time I replace the component on COM+ console
(test_service.dll), a new dll is generated on a .net framework dire
Verifiable? LOL
An MCP in the encryption area told me personally some 15 years ago (this
is not hearsay), he had to send his source code and received executable
code. He is top notch, I won't reveal his name.
As for "verifiable" or "legitimate" you may believe my word or not,
don't really care.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Ken Dibble wrote:
>
>> What will you lose?
>
>
> The ability to interact with a SAMBA 3 Domain.
>
Well, that could be a problem. I've got legacy Linux servers deployed
at client sites with older Samba servers, working fine for years.
Looks like I'll have to look a
What will you lose?
The ability to interact with a SAMBA 3 Domain.
That's gonna cost me. Although, MS swore up and down that they
wouldn't allow it in Windows 7 either, and then customers complained
in batchloads, so they added some registry hacks, and it works...also
in Win 8.x and relate
We just found out, in shipping out an update to one of our vertical
apps, that 1024x768 is still too large for some, with old square 4x3
aspect ratios and poor eyesight.
As long as human eyes are human eyes, that is never going to change
either. Nor are people over 40 ever going to be able to
No, Ricardo, I believe when Alan said "Source?" he meant:
Can you be provide a verifiable, legitimate citation to your claim
that the NSA gets Microsoft's encryption source code and ships it back
to them as object code?
I'd be interested in reading that too.
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Ric
Yes, the NSA compiles it. I guess they just check it's properly coded
and then compile it so that you may have better security.
On 05/06/15 11:43, Alan Bourke wrote:
All cryptographic code goes as source code to NSA and is returned as
object code to be used by windows
Does it? Source?
__
For years I've convinced that MSSoap Toolkit was indispensable on the
server side for answering Soap requests, and lately I've been searching on
the web about how to keep using existent web-services without it, replacing
it with something else.
Today I've uninstalled the soap toolkit from a virtua
On 4 June 2015 at 18:57, Stephen Russell wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
>
>> I understand the "upgrade" is free. But how much is the DOWNGRADE, if
>> they launch yet another turkey like Vista?
>
> Win 8 was Vista II
>
> Know a few people here with the alpha / beta prog
On 4 June 2015 at 16:56, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> I don't mind losing Hearts - but I sure hope Spider Solitaire is still there
> - as that's really the only occasional WinOS game I play.
I just checked. It has "Microsoft Solitaire Collection".
--
Paul
_
15 matches
Mail list logo
