On 2/22/2022 2:37 AM, Henry Rich wrote:
> Fixed for next beta. The comparison compounds +/@:comparison did not
> correctly detect an empty left argument.
Thank you!
--
Regards
Igor
--
For information about J forums see http://
I should have added, the workaround is to use +/"]@:=
Henry Rich
On 2/21/2022 7:57 AM, Igor Zhuravlov wrote:
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) '' ; 1
0 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) (0 $ 0) ; 1
4 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) (0 $ 0) ; 1
3 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) (0 $ 00) ; 1
1 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.
Fixed for next beta. The comparison compounds +/@:comparison did not
correctly detect an empty left argument.
Henry Rich
On 2/21/2022 7:57 AM, Igor Zhuravlov wrote:
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) '' ; 1
0 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) (0 $ 0) ; 1
4 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) (0 $ 0) ; 1
3 1
(+/
I can reproduce the problem on the last 4 lines. The others seem OK.
I'll look into it.
Henry Rich
On 2/21/2022 7:57 AM, Igor Zhuravlov wrote:
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) '' ; 1
0 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) (0 $ 0) ; 1
4 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) (0 $ 0) ; 1
3 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) (0
I am on an older version
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) '' ; 1
0 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) (0 $ 0) ; 1
0 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) (0 $ 0) ; 1
0 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) (0 $ 00) ; 1
0 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) (0 $ 00) ; , 1
0 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) (0 $ 00) ; 01
0 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) (0
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) '' ; 1
0 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) (0 $ 0) ; 1
4 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) (0 $ 0) ; 1
3 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) (0 $ 00) ; 1
1 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) (0 $ 00) ; , 1
0 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) (0 $ 00) ; 01
0 1
(+/@:= S: 0 <"0@i.@#) (0 $ 00) ; , 01
1 1