4:28 PM
To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: Bioontology.org and Linked Data?
On 7/23/13 6:51 PM, Ray Fergerson wrote:
Yes you are correct that our existing REST API does not support the LOD
model very well. Our new API, still in alpha, should be much better in
this respect. The d
) dereferencable URI's
3) content negotiation, and
4) REST access to all resources
Ray
-Original Message-
From: Kingsley Idehen [mailto:kide...@openlinksw.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 4:28 PM
To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: Bioontology.org and Linked Data?
On 7/23
o: HCLS
Subject: Bioontology.org and Linked Data?
All,
I continue to struggle with the notion that Bioontology.org is a point
of presence on the Web for Linked Data. The URIs associated with this
data space don't adhere to Linked Data principles as far as I can tell.
Examples:
Vapour A
-
From: Kingsley Idehen [mailto:kide...@openlinksw.com]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 9:10 AM
To: HCLS
Subject: Bioontology.org and Linked Data?
All,
I continue to struggle with the notion that Bioontology.org is a point
of presence on the Web for Linked Data. The URIs associated with this
data
All,
I continue to struggle with the notion that Bioontology.org is a point
of presence on the Web for Linked Data. The URIs associated with this
data space don't adhere to Linked Data principles as far as I can tell.
Examples:
Vapour Analysis:
Link:
http://linkeddata.uriburner.com:8000/va
