On May 30, 2007, at 7:11 AM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
I think there are two dimensions:
1) Allowing annotation properties to have subproperties so, e.g.
that skos:prefLabel and skos:altLabel can be subproperties of
rdfs:label.
Mostly this is addressed by punning in 1.1 but there are still
I think there are two dimensions:
1) Allowing annotation properties to have subproperties so, e.g. that
skos:prefLabel and skos:altLabel can be subproperties of rdfs:label.
Mostly this is addressed by punning in 1.1 but there are still
annotation property leftovers like rdfs:label and rdfs:c
0:12 AM
> To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
> Subject: Re: RE: [hcls] Harmonization of labels, descriptions and
> definitions
>
>
>
> > I would suggest that use cases such as "how to use labels in ontologies"
> > as well as how this would work in OWL1.1, sh
Ditto!
On May 29, 2007, at 10:19 AM, Eric Neumann wrote:
Thanks Matthias!
Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 5/29/2007 10:11 AM
To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: RE: [hcls] Harmonization of labels, descriptions and
Sorry, Bijan. I should have been more clear.
My statement is predicated on the use of OWL 1.0 which some of us are
still stuck using due to tools we've become committed to.
OWL 1.1 already provides some assistance in this realm of providing
more flexible support for 'lexical localization'*
Thanks Matthias!
Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 5/29/2007 10:11 AM
To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: RE: [hcls] Harmonization of labels, descriptions and definitions
> I would suggest that use cases such as &
> I would suggest that use cases such as "how to use labels in ontologies"
> as well as how this would work in OWL1.1, should be captured on a page (from
> the BioONT link) in a way that we can quickly get summaries without having
I have added links to the main ontology task force page at
http:
TECTED] on behalf of Bijan Parsia
Sent: Tue 5/29/2007 12:02 AM
To: William Bug
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci hcls
Subject: Re: [hcls] Harmonization of labels, descriptions and definitions
On May 29, 2007, at 4:58 AM, William Bug wrote:
> This is exactly the point I've been making for over a year
On May 29, 2007, at 4:58 AM, William Bug wrote:
This is exactly the point I've been making for over a year now
regarding use of SKOS in biomedical ontology development, and it is
why we use SKOS:prefLabel for all classes in BIRNLex (as well as
having the redundant rdfs:label for interopera
This is exactly the point I've been making for over a year now
regarding use of SKOS in biomedical ontology development, and it is
why we use SKOS:prefLabel for all classes in BIRNLex (as well as
having the redundant rdfs:label for interoperability purposes). The
"altLabel" provides a mean
Matthias,
This is a very important problem and an early harmonization effort could save a
lot of pain later on (A stitch in time saves nine).
An interesting point to be noted here is that the UMLS and NCI metathesauri
seek to do a similar thing for medical vocabularies.
Wondering if there's a
In think in the short term, in context of the HCLS demo, we can use
SPARUL rules to convert various forms of definitions and labels to
the usual rdfs:comment and rdfs:label. The only issue I see is that
there is a need for secondary labels (or conversely primary labels),
so we might want to
On May 25, 2007, at 8:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[2] For instance, definitions in the PATO OWL file (quality.owl) are
not visible in Protege. The OWL version of PATO has an
AnnotationProperty called "oboInOwl:hasDefintion" that has the value
"@_:A4843".
I and some other people have a
On May 25, 2007, at 8:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[2] For instance, definitions in the PATO OWL file (quality.owl) are
not visible in Protege. The OWL version of PATO has an
AnnotationProperty called "oboInOwl:hasDefintion" that has the value
"@_:A4843".
note there is a protege3 plugin
Thanks for the reminder, Matthias.
Cheers,
Bill
On May 25, 2007, at 11:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[2] For instance, definitions in the PATO OWL file (quality.owl) are
not visible in Protege. The OWL version of PATO has an
AnnotationProperty called "oboInOwl:hasDefintion" that has the val
15 matches
Mail list logo
