Re: [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support

2011-02-17 Thread Nikunj Mehta
Hi Pablo, I will reassign this bug to Eliott. Nikunj On Feb 17, 2011, at 6:38 PM, Pablo Castro wrote: > btw - the bug is assigned to Nikunj right now but I think that's just because > of an editing glitch. Nikunj please let me know if you were working on it, > otherwise I'll just submit the ch

[IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support

2011-02-17 Thread Pablo Castro
ug is assigned to Nikunj right now but I think that's just because of an editing glitch. Nikunj please let me know if you were working on it, otherwise I'll just submit the changes once I hear some feedback from this group. Thanks -pablo Left file: \IndexedDB

Re: [IndexedDB] More questions about IDBRequests always firing (WAS: Reason for aborting transactions)

2011-02-17 Thread Jeremy Orlow
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Pablo Castro wrote: > > From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Jeremy Orlow > Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 11:51 AM > > >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Jonas Sicking > wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at

[Bug 12114] New: Blocked setVersion transactions should be aborted when their database is closed

2011-02-17 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12114 Summary: Blocked setVersion transactions should be aborted when their database is closed Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Statu

RE: [IndexedDB] More questions about IDBRequests always firing (WAS: Reason for aborting transactions)

2011-02-17 Thread Pablo Castro
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Orlow Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 11:51 AM >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:02 AM, ben turner wrote: >> >>> Also, what should we do when y

Re: [IndexedDB] More questions about IDBRequests always firing (WAS: Reason for aborting transactions)

2011-02-17 Thread Jeremy Orlow
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:02 AM, ben turner > wrote: > >>> Also, what should we do when you enqueue a setVersion transaction and > then > >>> close the database handle? Maybe an ABORT_ERR there too? > >> > >> Yeah, that'd make sense to m

Re: [FileAPI] readAsDataURL()

2011-02-17 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 2/17/11 2:00 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: I think data-urls are allowed to have no content-type. Just like http requests can return no content-type header. A difference is that if HTTP returns no content-type header then the type is sniffed, whereas a data: URI with no media-type is treated as

Re: [IndexedDB] More questions about IDBRequests always firing (WAS: Reason for aborting transactions)

2011-02-17 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:02 AM, ben turner wrote: >>> Also, what should we do when you enqueue a setVersion transaction and then >>> close the database handle?  Maybe an ABORT_ERR there too? >> >> Yeah, that'd make sense to me. Just like if you enque any other >> transaction and then close the d

Re: [IndexedDB] More questions about IDBRequests always firing (WAS: Reason for aborting transactions)

2011-02-17 Thread ben turner
>> Also, what should we do when you enqueue a setVersion transaction and then >> close the database handle?  Maybe an ABORT_ERR there too? > > Yeah, that'd make sense to me. Just like if you enque any other > transaction and then close the db handle. We don't abort transactions that are already in

Re: [FileAPI] readAsDataURL()

2011-02-17 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Arun Ranganathan wrote: > David, > >> >> Arun, >> >> I'm assuming that you mean for the resulting data:// URL to have a >> mime >> type in it, right? But the spec just says to take the "blob's data >> content" and doesn't say anything about using the type of the bl

Re: [FileAPI] readAsDataURL()

2011-02-17 Thread Arun Ranganathan
David, > > Arun, > > I'm assuming that you mean for the resulting data:// URL to have a > mime > type in it, right? But the spec just says to take the "blob's data > content" and doesn't say anything about using the type of the blob > when > creating the URL. Yes, you're absolutely right, I und

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-02-17 Thread Michael[tm] Smith
James Graham , 2011-02-17 11:04 +0100: > On 02/17/2011 09:55 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > > >(I see that Art documented most of this in > >http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Testing_Requirements but thought > >this ought to be confirmed on the list) > > Is there some way to make put t

Re: [FileAPI] readAsDataURL()

2011-02-17 Thread David Flanagan
On 02/17/2011 06:55 AM, Arun Ranganathan wrote: - Original Message - Step 7 of the FileReader.readAsDataURL() algorithm currently just says: Set the result attribute to be blob's data content represented as a Data URL It should, I think, say something about the using the type of th

Re: [webstorage] Moving Web Storage back to Last Call WD

2011-02-17 Thread Michael[tm] Smith
Ian Hickson , 2011-02-14 10:13 +: > On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > > > What high priority work must be done such that this spec is ready to be > > re-published as a new Last Call Working draft? > > Tab, do you know of anything that is blocking redoing an LC? > > (Personally

[Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior

2011-02-17 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111 Summary: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All St

Re: [FileAPI] readAsDataURL()

2011-02-17 Thread Arun Ranganathan
- Original Message - > Step 7 of the FileReader.readAsDataURL() algorithm currently just > says: > > > Set the result attribute to be blob's data content represented as a > > Data URL > > It should, I think, say something about the using the type of the blob > as well as the content of

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-02-17 Thread James Graham
On 02/17/2011 01:03 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: On Feb/17/2011 5:04 AM, ext James Graham wrote: On 02/17/2011 09:55 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: (I see that Art documented most of this in http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Testing_Requirements but thought this ought to be confirmed on t

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-02-17 Thread Arthur Barstow
On Feb/17/2011 5:04 AM, ext James Graham wrote: On 02/17/2011 09:55 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: (I see that Art documented most of this in http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Testing_Requirements but thought this ought to be confirmed on the list) Is there some way to make put this d

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-02-17 Thread James Graham
On 02/17/2011 09:55 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: (I see that Art documented most of this in http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Testing_Requirements but thought this ought to be confirmed on the list) Is there some way to make put this documentation in some common location rather than

Re: Testing Requirements

2011-02-17 Thread Dominique Hazael-Massieux
Hi Marcos, Le mardi 15 février 2011 à 13:19 +0100, Marcos Caceres a écrit : > Can we please get a full rundown of the systems available on test > server. Can we also have all the details about getting access to the > server, etc. Here is what I know off the top of my head: * the content on w3c-te