Referencing a note dated 2003 may not sound strong any more - web-based
applications (or to be more specific - their UI) have evolved significantly
since the date. Today limiting developers to an extremely low level markup
API, such as SVG or HTML only leads to huge, hardly manageable JavaScript UI
I agree with Erik, the generic feature probably is not worth the simple use
case. It can (and probably should) be easily implemented by the developer in
his form logic when needed.
Sergey/
On 21 October 2010 22:56, Erik Arvidsson wrote:
> The forminput and formchange events are dispatched on
> > Starting shortening member names can open the Pandora
> box. What about getElementsByTagName, querySelector etc.? I
> think at this point of time it is better to avoid such an
> initiative.
>
> Because?
> And why at this point in time?
To my knowledge the group is trying to advance the DOM-
Starting shortening member names can open the Pandora box. What about
getElementsByTagName, querySelector etc.? I think at this point of time it is
better to avoid such an initiative.
Sergey/
--- On Thu, 27/8/09, Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
wrote:
> From: Web Applications
> Whether there are libraries that use them or not, I
> honestly can't tell. However there are scenarios where 3rd
> party libraries like jQuery or prototype might require to
> know if the document has mutated to update their internal
> data structures.
They do not know now if document is mutated
Hi,
For me it is not clear at all what are the use cases for DOM Mutations Events
on web pages (so maybe simply dropping their implementation would be an
option?).
If the group could first identify the use cases for Mutation Events on the web
pages, then:
a) it would become clear to everyone
ard events with mouse events where
detail property keeps count of clicks happened in a row.
Sergey Ilinsky/
for
that matter.
Sergey Ilinsky/
--- On Thu, 12/2/09, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> From: Jonas Sicking
> Subject: Re: [XHR2] Progress events during synchronous requests
> To: "Anne van Kesteren"
> Cc: "Webapps WG"
> Date: Thursday, 12 February, 2009, 4:52 A
valid target and mousewheel event is not different from
them either (consider mousemove).
Sergey Ilinsky/
ng
to say "b" - the design is very much tight and consistent.
-Boris
Sergey Ilinsky/
fired after the mutation, event won't be capable
of bubbling
(I did not yet dig into any specific functionality that depends on the
present behavior (and potential change) of the events in subject (for
sure lots of stuff would break))
Tech Lead at Backbase,
Sergey Ilinsky/
P.S. Bac
who have set up
the DOM-family specifications for use cases they had in mind with the
DOM modules' "featuring" features.
Sergey Ilinsky/
12 matches
Mail list logo
