Re: Pylons: pros and cons

2008-10-13 Thread Mike Orr
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Tomasz Nazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi there! > > I've been a Pylons user for more than a year already. Few other people > in the neighbourhood ask me for Pylons advantages often, so I also > talk about Pylons disadvantages also. > Here I'd like to point ou

Re: Pylons: pros and cons

2008-10-13 Thread Michael Bayer
On Oct 13, 9:54 pm, Wayne Witzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK. Back to your code? What is this MemCachedMapper.. google 2 hits > > only. Is it your own solution, does it work, can you share? > > Not my solution, was a solution presented a while back on the SA > mailing list. > Seehttp://gr

Re: Pylons: pros and cons

2008-10-13 Thread Michael Bayer
On Oct 13, 12:14 pm, "Tomasz Nazar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) all model classes are defined in 1 file together with database mapping like everyone is saying, you can roll this however you want and however is appropriate to the type of app you're building. > > 2) SQLAlchemy 2nd level cache

Re: Pylons: pros and cons

2008-10-13 Thread Wayne Witzel
On Oct 13, 5:33 pm, "Tomasz Nazar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks both of you for answers... > > > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Wayne Witzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 13, 12:14 pm, "Tomasz Nazar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi there! > > >> 1) all model classes are defin

Re: Pylons: pros and cons

2008-10-13 Thread Tomasz Nazar
Thanks both of you for answers... On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Wayne Witzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 13, 12:14 pm, "Tomasz Nazar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi there! >> >> 1) all model classes are defined in 1 file together with database mapping >> >> That is 2nd most frustrati

Re: Where is secure_button_to in new WebHelpers 0.6.1

2008-10-13 Thread Jose Galvez
Since there is no longer any link_to_remote function? does anyone have a recipe for how to duplicate it with jquery? Jose Mike Orr wrote: > On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Jan Koprowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> On Oct 12, 10:11 pm, "Jorge Vargas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >

Re: Paster/CherryPy production configuration

2008-10-13 Thread Ian Bicking
Kamil Gorlo wrote: > So there is no problem, that for one Paster there is only one Python > interpreter (maybe I do not understand GIL correctly)? Using processes > despite Python threads is not better in your opinion? paster serve just starts a server -- the server doesn't have to be single-pro

Re: Pylons: pros and cons

2008-10-13 Thread Wayne Witzel
On Oct 13, 12:14 pm, "Tomasz Nazar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there! > > I've been a Pylons user for more than a year already. Few other people > in the neighbourhood ask me for Pylons advantages often, so I also > talk about Pylons disadvantages also. > Here I'd like to point out some of

Re: Pylons: pros and cons

2008-10-13 Thread Dean Landolt
> Here goes: > > 1) all model classes are defined in 1 file together with database mapping For this particular gripe I think you're a little off-base. This is all personal preference, and the bigger your model gets, the better off you are breaking it up. Google around a bit and you'll find a few

Pylons: pros and cons

2008-10-13 Thread Tomasz Nazar
Hi there! I've been a Pylons user for more than a year already. Few other people in the neighbourhood ask me for Pylons advantages often, so I also talk about Pylons disadvantages also. Here I'd like to point out some of them and ask you for your opinion/answer.. (basically I'm a happy Pylons use

Re: Beaker info

2008-10-13 Thread Michael Bayer
beaker will cache something "forever" if you use a persistent system like file-based caching and don't set any timeout on the cache. It should remain persistent across server restarts. as far as "per request", I stick things on "c" to accomplish this. On Oct 10, 11:40 am, Wichert Akkerman <[EM