My vote has to go to ThunderCats: Jaga on the backend with Cheetara
for templating.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegr
I'm not talking about facebook/youtube type sites, I'm talking about a
real web application
where users access information, enter information, search and analyze
information, and visualize information.
I'm not creating web sites for popularity contests, but using the web
as a platform for real
so
If you are serious about perusing this path, please consider Seam/RichFaces
before doing so.
- Original Message
From: Tycon
To: pylons-discuss
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 6:21:28 PM
Subject: Re: Pylons vs Tomcat+GWT
The point of GWT is that you can use java for the client si
On Jan 31, 2009, at 6:21 PM, Tycon wrote:
>
> The point of GWT is that you can use java for the client side code,
why is that important ? are you one of these "oh the JVM ! we NEED
the JVM ! " types ?
>
> with most
> of its core libraries, and you get better optimized javascript, and
how c
On Jan 31, 2009, at 4:28 PM, Tycon wrote:
>
> I'm planning on using GWT only for client side code and doing all
> server calls
> using JSON, and not using GWT's RPC mechanism. So I guess that would
> avoid the problem you are talking about ?
or you could just use jquery...ive no idea how you'd
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Tycon wrote:
>
> because it's not ready so it's just a toy at this point, just like
> pyjamas, while GWT is used by real production websites (ever heard of
> gmail)
Actually all I have heard is the opposite. In fact one of GWT's
biggest "but" is that none of ser
because it's not ready so it's just a toy at this point, just like
pyjamas, while GWT is used by real production websites (ever heard of
gmail)
On Jan 31, 5:54 pm, Alberto Valverde wrote:
> Tycon wrote:
> > The point of GWT is that you can use java for the client side code,
> > with most
> > of
Tycon wrote:
> The point of GWT is that you can use java for the client side code,
> with most
> of its core libraries, and you get better optimized javascript, and
> much better
> development environment and tools (IDE, debugger).
> This is superior compared to using any javascript framework, non
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 8:55 AM, jerry wrote:
>
> """
> the "enterprise" way of thinking is what's brought us the economic
> disaster, vast ponzi schemes where everyone looks the other way,
> etc. I.e. "seems to work for now so fuck it".
> """
>
> Bravo, Bravo, and BRAVO!
>
> This is so brilliant
> I know about the pep and how python source files are encoded, but the
> interactive shell is something completely different. I wonder on what
> local env variable does "shell" depend. Since I have all of them
> either sl_SI.UTF8 or en_GB.UTF-8.
The Python interactive shell depends on the local
The point of GWT is that you can use java for the client side code,
with most
of its core libraries, and you get better optimized javascript, and
much better
development environment and tools (IDE, debugger).
This is superior compared to using any javascript framework, none of
which offers
the com
Tycon wrote:
> I'm planning on using GWT only for client side code and doing all
> server calls
> using JSON, and not using GWT's RPC mechanism. So I guess that would
> avoid the problem you are talking about ?
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but neither Perl/CGI not Pylons/Rails etc
> CANNOT
> be us
Michael Bayer wrote:
> (we of course ultimately rewrote the whole thing in pylons)
This.
> same database code and database (remember we're still in java), the
> components rendered about 50 times faster.
And this. What have you gained from Pylons? Development speed or
performance as well?
Regard
Thanks. I have probably been lucky to not have had the opportunity of
having GWT inflicted on any of my projects, but your appreciation of
GWT resonates very true -- and with many projects java... the problem
probably is that google was constrained to hire too quickly, so after
having crea
;).. pretty good... . not atypical, I'm afraid. Nothing wrong with Java,
per se.. but Sun tried to make it an 'industry' (and I suppose in some sense
it is), but when you're trying to build an 'industry', you have to let a lot
of people in who maybe shouldn't be there (like IBM, and Oracle).. and
I worked briefly with a project that used GWT (we of course ultimately
rewrote the whole thing in pylons) for some portions of a web based
administration tool. The components were incredibly simple table
controls displaying database data. There were two dozen GWT-derived
source files used to g
On 31 ene, 00:24, Damjan wrote:
> > Damjan, and does ipython works from $PYTHONUSERBASE? because it
> > doesn't works on virtualenv. If if works then would be another great
> > advantage :)
>
> Yes it works. I've just installed the distro version of ipython, and
> it can import the modules in my
17 matches
Mail list logo
